OpenMRS Implementers: http://go.openmrs.org/implementers
*** OpenMRS 2012 Implementers Meeting: http://2012.openmrs.org/ ***
For those who have upgraded to 1.9 and are now using the new concept features, I have a question regarding concept reference terms and your general workflow. In the demo that Andy did during a University call (http://connect.iu.edu/p3mg1bi 7j6y/?launcher=false&fcsConten t=true&pbMode=normal), I believe the concept reference terms had to each be added individually in order to map a local concept to an external source.
Is this how groups using this feature are managing their concept reference terms, by manually creating each reference term in advance of setting up a mapping?
thanks for any info!
My point about concept description -- concept description validation fails if the database has a row with a null value for the concept_description.description.
But descriptions are not required for concepts.
On Nov 6, 2012 8:10 AM, "Rafal Korytkowski" <ra...@openmrs.org> wrote:
Concepts without descriptions are valid at the moment, but there's a ticket to "fix" this: https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/Trunk-3616Considering Andy's comment I think we should abandon the idea to require at least one description if there's a name in the same locale.
On 5 November 2012 23:29, Andrew Kanter <andy_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Ellen...
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: concept reference terms in 1.9