W. Trevor King
unread,Oct 19, 2016, 2:15:21 AM10/19/16Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Brandon Philips, Jonathan Boulle, Stephen Day, Brendan Burns, Jason Bouzane, Vincent Batts, John Starks, dev
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:44:01AM +0000, Brandon Philips wrote:
> We should release v1.0.0-rc2 of the image spec from commit 6e820ec.
It would be nice to land [1] with 1.0.0-rc2 to clear the path for [2]
(fixing what I expect will be a fairly common unpacking error [3]).
[2] still needs some polish to pass lint checks, but I'm waiting until
the spec wording lands before doing that cleanup.
If rc3 is only a week or two away, we can always punt these pulls to
rc3. But it would be nice to have at least a few rcs before 1.0 that
didn't have such major semantic-clarifications in them (e.g. the
discussion in [1] about whether the collision removal should be
recursive or not). If we are intending to have a few clean rcs, then
delaying this vote for a few days to get [1] landed might save an
extra cycle.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/317
[2]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/pull/42
[3]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-tools/issues/41
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (
http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy