--
***
Please note: the NVDA project has a Citizen and Contributor Code of Conduct.
NV Access expects that all community members will read and abide by the rules set out in this document while participating in this group.
https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
You can contact the group owners and moderators via nvda-user...@nvaccess.org.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NVDA Screen Reader Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nvda-users+...@nvaccess.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/nvaccess.org/d/msgid/nvda-users/CACHadJ0VOws%2B7vrT5qHk7CH%2BUJvOuioibtCsKCREfVU%2BQ5E%2Byw%40mail.gmail.com.
On Mar 11, 2026, at 1:03 AM, Andrew Downie <doveta...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Roberto, Andrew and group,
I actually have great success creating screen recordings demonstrating accessibility bugs using Zoom with screen sharing enabled, running them through Gemini asking for a summary and a bug report in agile format including a single-line subject, description, steps to reproduce, actual results and expected results. The result I typically get is at least 90 percent of the way done. After just a little cleanup, I am ready to post a high-quality bug report with screen recording in a much shorter time than doing each of those tasks separately without AI.
As mentioned by others already, though, the key is trust but verify. Hallucinations do happen, and they can sometimes be quite sneaky.
Thanks,
Darrell Hilliker, NU7I, CPWA, Salesforce Certified User Experience Designer
When disabled people ask you to improve your accessibility, they’re asking you to make a conscious choice. Will you welcome us in or leave us out? Good people make the right accessibility choices every time.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/nvaccess.org/d/msgid/nvda-users/5C37CFCC-6C12-440C-AB41-142808747A7D%40gmail.com.
On Mar 11, 2026, at 5:17 AM, darrell....@gmail.com wrote:
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/nvaccess.org/d/msgid/nvda-users/08a501dcb10d%24e53af610%24afb0e230%24%40gmail.com.
Hi,
All the best
Steve
--
Computer Room Services
77 Exeter Close, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4PW
--
Plaud is actually better than Zoom for AI summarising. And it is not tied to Zoom only.
All the best
Steve
--
Computer Room Services
77 Exeter Close, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4PW
T: +44(0)1438-742286, M: +44(0)7956-334938
E: st...@comproom.co.uk, W: https://www.comproom.co.uk
I trust the AI summaries in zoom as they are about 99 percent correct. I know as I do verify every single time and I think it only messed up once. they are also well formatted, better than any other summary tool I've used. I'm actually quite impressed.
I use the windows alt print screen method and upload my screenshots to gpt and have it summaries in grate detail especially if I'm submitting bugs. I've already submitted some bug reports which hopefully should help developers. Your method works as well. tool to task and all.
take care and have a happy Wednesday.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/nvaccess.org/d/msgid/nvda-users/B8A2CDAC-2C09-423E-8B45-FA3598DC249A%40gmail.com.