DOUBT IN TUTORIAL 8, WEEK 2

52 views
Skip to first unread message

Hemangini Goyal

unread,
Oct 24, 2020, 1:38:30 PM10/24/20
to Discussion forum for Mathematics for Data Science I
Respected Sir/Ma'am,
In the tutorial 8 of week 2, for thief one head is considered for making the line. For thief 2 the foot is considered for making line. Why?
cant we take feet for both or head for both ? as it will make difference for coordinates we use.

Surbhi Gandhi

unread,
Oct 24, 2020, 2:06:02 PM10/24/20
to Discussion forum for Mathematics for Data Science I, Hemangini Goyal
same doubt

Danish Manningachali

unread,
Oct 25, 2020, 3:07:29 AM10/25/20
to Discussion forum for Mathematics for Data Science I, surbhiga...@gmail.com, Hemangini Goyal
Hi,

The angle which is made by the torchlight is in such a way that for thief 1, his head is the first thing that will come under the torchlight while for thief 2 his feet would be the first thing that will come under torchlight. If you check out the figure drawn in the tutorial once again, I'm sure you can understand the phenomenon I explained easier. I hope I was able to explain it properly, otherwise I'm sure the instructor will reply to this thread and can explain it better than me here.

Thanks

Malabika Guha Mustafi

unread,
Oct 26, 2020, 1:23:39 AM10/26/20
to Discussion forum for Mathematics for Data Science I, Danish Manningachali, surbhiga...@gmail.com, Hemangini Goyal
To get the range perfectly we need to consider the head of thief 1 and leg of thief 2. 
The torch light rays actually give  range of slopes (consider , the range from m1 to m2, where m1 is the slope of left most ray and m2 is the slope of right most ray  ).
if range of  slope of  thief 1 line(considering head)  and slope of thief 2(considering leg)  compare with range of m1 and m2  we can definitely say who can be visible [ when m1 is greater than head of first thief then it is confirmed that the thief is not within m1 -m2 range so not visible. But if we confider the feet of first thief then there is a possibility that feet slope may be lesser than m1 but other portion of thief's 1 body is within the range so visible. so, head of first thief is optimum position.]
 Again if we consider the 2nd thief's head for calculating slope of line we may miss number 2, there is a chance of miscalculation.
[when m2 is less than 2nd thief's leg , it is confirmed 2nd thief is out of range so not visible,. but if we consider his head then there is a possibility that head may be out of range but other's part may be within range and visible. so leg  position is optimum for second thief.]


subhajit POD

unread,
Oct 26, 2020, 5:42:37 AM10/26/20
to Discussion forum for Mathematics for Data Science I, Malabika Guha Mustafi, Danish Manningachali, surbhiga...@gmail.com, Hemangini Goyal
Try to observe that those are the optimal positions. 
To see both of them in the same cone of light it is enough to see the head of the thief  who is standing in the front and the feet of the thief who is standing in the back. 
Best
Subhajit
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages