D-LCM involves multiple elements for reasons and rightly so. Unlike face-to-face classroom setting which is characterized largely by :1) limited class (batch) size unlike MOOC where N is any number 2) batches created or allotted prefering some commonality (known languages, previous knowledge, age or experience 3) attendance and physical presence bring some sense of seriousness and attentiveness on the part of learners due to fear of being noticed or called out 4) where intermittent probing by the teacher (good teacher by the way) for every concept handled, and the instant nodding or otherwise (by individual or a group of learners or entire class) gives a spontaneous and continuous feed-back in many expressive ways (from ‘aha’ moments to dull gesture to no-response at all ). This feedback makes the teacher reorient his/her pedagogical approach. Subsequent topics and the pace depend entirely on such things occurring concurrently.
While MOOC has enormous social impact valuse (being cost-effective, instant, updated and dynamic, access to all with equity and equality), the design and delivery involves an integrated approach. It caters to a host of diversity (in thr form of learner profile and so) the inbuilt flexibilities of access of contents as per one’s timing and pace, the LCM looked otherwise so complex, has actually been made easy and so interesting by the Team of IIT-Mumbai. The D-LCM course has been brilliantly packaged .
It is impossible to term any particular component as ‘MOST USEFUL CONTET’ : From Warm up Stage to Week 5, DLCM is so scientifically designed and carefully delivered that it equips us all with the required skills for an effective MOOC design and delivery. All the contents are interwoven and inter-dependent.
1- From designing an appropriate LeD (keeping in mind the integrity of attention, Reflection Spots, Chunking, Do’s and Don’ts ensuring sustained and motivated engagement of the learners) with focus on Learning Objectives (SMART compliant) for a personalised self-pace learning.
2- Ensuring learners remain focussed, Reflection Spots, Practice question, LbDs work like invisible (non-intimidating mentors). Practice question lets us know what have been missed out. Weekly assessment as AQ, RQs and others reinforces our learning.
3- LxTs adds to the deeper and wider knowledge of the topic dealt in LeD in the form of OER (documents, articles, videos, research papers etc) through repositories and making a prudent use (without adding any burden to the learner) and responsible reuse of OER (within the licensing obligations)
4- Discussion forum provides a huge peer learning. The Assimilation Quiz and the Discussion Forum updates are complimentary and keep the peers fairly on the same page. 5) System of Weekly Feed-back is again significant
I find all contents as useful. In fact, I find this ‘Focus Question ’ of LxI Week 5 a sort of bigger REFLECTION SPOT smartly phrased by the LCM Team entailing all of us to recapitulate and register all that have been transacted from Week 1 to Week 5
{ PS: The LxT 3.2 Technology tools for designing LbDs and the detailed orientation to the nuances of licensing and copyright gave us an idea of being responsible and professional while desining MOOC. Enthusiasm and expertise alone are not good enough. Being ethical and legally correct in our approach is crucial }
Regards,
(Manoj K. Srivastava)
Thank you for sharing your insightful reflection on the LCM course. Your analysis highlights the complexities and nuances involved in designing and delivering Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) compared to traditional face-to-face settings.
I echo your sentiment regarding the integrated approach adopted by the IIT-Mumbai team, which has made the LCM course both comprehensive and engaging.
Your breakdown of the various components, from designing appropriate Learning Experiences (LeDs) to fostering peer learning through discussion forums, underscores the depth and breadth of the course's content. It's heartening to hear that all elements are deemed valuable, reflecting the careful planning and execution by the course creators.
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis, and I'm glad to hear that the LCM course has been beneficial to you.
Your feedback underscores the effectiveness of the course in achieving its objectives.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Discussion forum for Designing LearnerCentric MOOCs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to noc24-ge12-disc...@nptel.iitm.ac.in.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/nptel.iitm.ac.in/d/msgid/noc24-ge12-discuss/35e89c26-18a7-4bb0-8a3f-b9abbebae827n%40nptel.iitm.ac.in.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/nptel.iitm.ac.in/d/optout.
Thank you for your feedback. Keep learning .
Regards,
Dr. Radhika Injamuri,
DFM-2024.
Hello!
The Designing Learner-Centric MOOCs course has got me thinking primarily about two things:
1. The ways in which assessment by the learner – both self and peer – can be made a core part of a teaching programme. While the idea of assessment by the learner is not a new one, the course has provided me with an opportunity to think about it systematically. Formative and Summative assessments with the help of reflection spots, evaluation rubrics and peer interaction contribute to the assessment process. Reflection Week is something I have never practised but now I think it is crucial to enable the learner to breathe, reflect and thereby assess her learning trajectory. If these forms of assessments can in some way be prioritized over assessment by the course facilitator, it can lead to healthy pedagogical practices. I will surely be thinking more about learner assessment and the ways in which I can make it a core component of my classroom activity.
2. Orchestration of the four components of MOOC i.e. LeD, LbD, LxT and LxI. While LxI offers some non-linearity in the learning process, LeD, LbD and LxT are necessarily linear. My own classroom activity involves much more non-linearity in that I typically start with LbD (and LxI). The nature of LbD activity on the part of the learner decides what comes next LeD or LxT. So, my classrooms are often very fluid with the learner’s activity determining the further course of action. My experience with this MOOC has led me to think about the (dis-)advantages of (non-)linearity in a learner-centric pedagogical practice and has thus been beneficial to me.
Almost all of my peers, who have posted under “LxI Week 5” until now, share with me the importance of self-assessment by the learners (especially through reflection spots). There have been no comments as yet on the linear nature of orchestration. Some comments on the use of LLMs to create LxT and information regarding the use of technology in creating an effective MOOC have also been made.
best,
Your reflections on learner assessment and the orchestration of MOOC components are thought-provoking.
I appreciate your focus on integrating learner assessment, both self and peer, into teaching programs. Your consideration of formative and summative assessments, along with reflection spots and peer interaction, highlights the importance of empowering learners in their own assessment journey.
Your observations on the orchestration of MOOC components resonate with my own experiences. The balance between linearity and non-linearity in learning processes is crucial, and your classroom's fluidity in response to learner activity is inspiring. Reflecting on the advantages and disadvantages of this approach can undoubtedly inform future pedagogical practices.
Thank you for sharing your insights, and I look forward to further discussions on these topics.
Best regards,
Amritpreet KaurDear Ravi Palekarji
Thank you for your email and your kind words regarding the LCM course. I'm delighted to hear that you find the course content interesting and engaging. Your feedback on the well-designed topics and their delivery in a simple yet captivating manner is greatly appreciated.
I understand that hectic work schedules can sometimes disrupt learning timelines, but I'm glad to hear that despite this, you're motivated to continue your learning journey. Your dedication speaks volumes about the quality of the course content.
Once again, thank you for your feedback and continued participation in the course.
Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions or feedback.
Please Note that the due date for Knowledge Quiz for Week 5 is Today itself, so please do not miss on it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Discussion forum for Designing LearnerCentric MOOCs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to noc24-ge12-disc...@nptel.iitm.ac.in.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/nptel.iitm.ac.in/d/msgid/noc24-ge12-discuss/9664eec2-18c2-4f84-a3ba-7a036fd599f7n%40nptel.iitm.ac.in.
Thank you for sharing your insights on practicing reflective coaching. I'm glad to hear that the content on using journals, peer reviews, video recordings, and student feedback has proven useful for retrospection and improvement of your lectures.
Your engagement with these topics demonstrates a commitment to continuous improvement and innovation in teaching methods.
Looking forward to further discussions on these subjects.
Regards