Check your QUALIFIER MARKS IN 5 SECONDS!

[Mohit Singh]

If you are lazy or want to cross-check your marks:

Check your QUALIFIER MARKS IN 5 SECONDS!

You will find a tutorial inside this link, This program takes pdf (don't rename)[Your response sheet] as an input and then gives marks and percentages subject wise/total. https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1PDevzeXhyXhcppIXVcYur1W2GByRhneb?usp=sharing

[Anand Iyer]

What! 

 

How did you account for the shifts?  and, how did you create the answer keys?  Nevertheless, very interesting thought...

[Nitesh Naik]

Great work.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Discussion forum for Computational Thinking" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cs1001-discus...@nptel.iitm.ac.in.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/nptel.iitm.ac.in/d/msgid/cs1001-discuss/b669ba5a-1a60-4de3-9dd6-28fb3dc647b9n%40nptel.iitm.ac.in.

[Anand Iyer]

There's something wrong with this...I believe the answer key is incorrect...

Check again, Mohit...

[Anand Iyer]

don't share publicly, before you're sure what you're doing.  earnest advice.

Guys, don't use this until Mohit confirms...  

[Kartik mittal]

I dont know about any other shift but it calculated my numbers of shift 2 correctly i.e 179 and also the subject wise marks were correct.....

Cheers to Mohit singh for creating this code or program....

Feedback- Make it a little bit user friendly as people who are new to programming language will find it difficult to use otherwise everything is alright....

[Nitesh Naik]

Worked for me and the output seems correct. I modified code and uploaded the response sheet in my Google Drive under folder data.

import tabula

from google.colab import drive

drive.mount('/content/drive')

k=tabula.read_pdf("/content/drive/My Drive/data/POD20Q1QP2S21690023.pdf",pages="all")

[Anand Iyer]

I'm from the first shift, and it doesn't. I noticed at least a couple of key answers entered wrongly there...

Use this at your own risk..if you insist.

--

Cheers,

Anand

[Anand Iyer]

ok, I'm going to just shut up.  Please use it at your own risk..

this's incorrect, I repeat.  The answer keys are wrongly entered at least for some of those that I checked.

--

Cheers,

Anand

[Nitesh Naik]

@Anand Iyer  output may be wrong for a few shifts. I am not sure. What I appreciate here is an idea and I learned something new. There could be small mismatch but in my case results were correct as per my manual calculation.

Mohit just simplified the marks calculation process. Final results will come from IITM. Let's share knowledge and learn together.

[Anuraj Kashyap]

i think there is an error in counting the partial marks for eg if the question has 3 correct answers and i selected 2 of the correct answers, it counts only the
marks i would got if i have one answer correct. According to manual counting my total marks is 191.33 and according to the python program it appears 190.33.

On Friday, December 4, 2020 at 9:36:37 AM UTC+5:30 Mohit Singh wrote: