Kia ora katoa,
We went through a preservation and reuse exercise to see what our strategy might be around this kind of thing. Thought the ETDs themselves are all rights reserved (at present), we’ve made the metadata (including the abstracts) cc-0/Public Domain. This is to encourage exactly the kind of effort below. If they want to spend some money curating and disseminating University of Canterbury’s research, all power to them
I see this as being a great example of using the most open license in order to get the most use out of our higher degree student’s hard work (not to speak of supervisors, librarians and technicians...) all funded by the NZ state, for everyone to share.
Also, this will encourage the republication of work found in theses, as journal editors and publishers are known for trawling these kinds of databases for good work. It seems that embargoing your ETD for publication is in fact pretty counterproductive!
Ngā mihi,
Anton.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ETD" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
etd+uns...@ndltd.org.
To post to this group, send email to e...@ndltd.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/group/etd/.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/msgid/etd/4a374a20-6a51-46fb-983c-859bc3518946%40ndltd.org.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/optout.
However (thinking after posting) is this just a commercial version of OATD.org?
aa
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/msgid/etd/8CFBD20EF3B10B4D972B129D5CB63963BDB84489%40UCEXMBX01-D.canterbury.ac.nz.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/msgid/etd/8CFBD20EF3B10B4D972B129D5CB63963BDB844D9%40UCEXMBX01-D.canterbury.ac.nz.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/optout.
Dear Amanda & ETD Colleagues,
Looks like EBSCO has been getting the word out widely! At Caltech we understand this new service to be a nice strategy for universities with ETDs in their OA repositories to make those works of scholarship discoverable in the EBSCO discovery system that many libraries have implemented as their own ‘Google’. Caltech sees this as a “why not?” because it requires nothing new from our ETD repository: we already have it configured for open harvesting.
But, more significantly, we are investing in the new Open Thesis portal supported by the Open Science Framework (OSF) and ARL’s SHARE service. This is a much more robust system for making repository works discoverable (and preservable via OSF). It means that searchers looking for open access content in repositories will find theses in a search that might also retrieve relevant papers, datasets, working papers, and articles. Our view is that, because theses don’t stand alone but, rather, are often one work in a family of related research products, the OSF-SHARE approach is a more accurate and authentic way of discovering research of interest.
Relevant links of possible interest:
https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.1074/
Best wishes,
Gail
Gail P. Clement | Head of Research Services | Caltech Library | Mail Code 1-43 | Pasadena CA 91125-4300 | 626-395-1203
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ETD" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to etd+uns...@ndltd.org.
To post to this group, send email to e...@ndltd.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/group/etd/.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/d/msgid/etd/1ded92e7-d612-4eef-8e1f-b4dcfa8de4ab%40ndltd.org.