Why did we create a nss-3.90 branch?

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Relyea

unread,
Mar 19, 2026, 12:38:33 PMMar 19
to mozilla's crypto code discussion list
Shouldn't it have been NSS-3.122?

John Schanck

unread,
Mar 19, 2026, 12:44:49 PMMar 19
to Robert Relyea, mozilla's crypto code discussion list
Firefox is extending support for ESR 115 (which uses 3.90). So we're backporting the current version of the builtin roots module / certdata.txt.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 9:38 AM 'Robert Relyea' via dev-tec...@mozilla.org <dev-tec...@mozilla.org> wrote:
Shouldn't it have been NSS-3.122?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "dev-tec...@mozilla.org" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dev-tech-cryp...@mozilla.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-tech-crypto/9c19c66b-0329-4021-beb8-bf6d93c51f69%40redhat.com.

Robert Relyea

unread,
Mar 19, 2026, 1:26:37 PMMar 19
to John Schanck, mozilla's crypto code discussion list
On 3/19/26 9:44 AM, John Schanck wrote:
Firefox is extending support for ESR 115 (which uses 3.90). So we're backporting the current version of the builtin roots module / certdata.txt.


OK, I looked like it was somehow taging the current branch, but if I update NSS_3_90_BRANCH I only get the back port.

Could we have announments on the dev-tech-crypto or nss-dev like this?

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages