2023 at 1:06 PM Kurt Seifried wrote: > Is there a dashboard with a summary of where they are in the > process/expected timelines (eg weeks/months/years?) so we know which to >

version > 2.8.1. I don't see any new requirements that would require lead time for > CAs to implement. I should be ready to post this final version within the > next two weeks

Effective October 1, 2022, CA providers must populate the CCADB fields under "Pertaining to Certificates Issued by This CA" with either the CRL Distribution Point for

shard [1]. To mitigate against any risk caused by CCADB information lagging the actual state of CA revocation information, policy should be amended such that: 1. The location(s) of

Practices [1]. This change will align the two documents. Thanks, Corey [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Required_or_Recommended_Practices#Verifying_Domain_Name_Ownership

> version 2.8.1 candidates. Related to the "annual update" of a CA's CP/CPS, >>> the change would replace "at least once every year" in item

(version 1 ... n) over the lifetimes of multiple roots. It may be that they want to keep v.1 from 1995 still accessible after 2020, but under the given scenario, it would not be required

UTC+1: > >> Hi all, >> >> I commented on the GitHub issue >> , >> but if we're looking at changing this requirement, I think we should do so >

All, This discussion thread relates to Issue #257 in the Mozilla PKI Policy repository on GitHub. The proposed language for the last paragraph of