Public Discussion of Acquisition of e-commerce monitoring GmbH by AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme GmbH

瀏覽次數:1,697 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息

Ben Wilson

未讀,
2024年2月2日 上午11:45:192月2日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org

All,

Recently we were advised that e-commerce monitoring GmbH is being acquired by AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme GmbH.

e-commerce monitoring operates the GLOBALTRUST 2020 root CA that is included in the Mozilla root store. They have advised us of the following:

There are no changes to the operation of the CA and RA functions.

Changes to the corporate structure:

- New shareholder:
AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H.
registered under the number FN 98272v commercial court Vienna
Lamezanstraße 4-8
1230 Vienna, Austria
https://www.austriacard.com/

- New Management
new: CEO ("Geschäftsführer") Mr. Emmanouil Kontos
new: Attorney ("Prokurist") Mr. Markus Kirchmayr
old: CEO Hans Zeger

- Registered headquarter
new: Handelskai 388/621, 1020 Vienna, Austria
old: Redtenbachergasse 20, 1160 Vienna, Austria

According to section 8.1 of the Mozilla Root Store Policy, “If the receiving or acquiring company is new to the Mozilla root store, it MUST demonstrate compliance with the entirety of this policy. There MUST be a public discussion regarding its admittance to the root store. If Mozilla reaches a positive conclusion after public discussion, then the affected certificate(s) MAY remain in the root store.”

By this email, I am initiating a four-week public discussion period, scheduled to close on Friday, 1-March-2024, to allow for at least three full weeks of public discussion. The first week (Feb. 5 – 9) is intended to give the acquiring company time to address the following topics:

·        Compliance with the Mozilla Root Store Policy

·        Ownership and governance

·        Investment and budget for CA operations, risk management, and compliance

·        Community engagement and involvement in industry groups

·        Employee expertise and continuity

·        Operational design and ongoing GRC management

·        Auditors and auditing

Thanks,

Ben Wilson

Mozilla Root Store Program

Suchan Seo

未讀,
2024年2月2日 晚上7:53:352月2日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Ben Wilson
 While not have knowledge to comment about acquire itself, doesn't this more fit to ccadb mailing list? I thought root store policy about individual root was moved to there
2024년 2월 3일 토요일 오전 1시 45분 19초 UTC+9에 Ben Wilson님이 작성:

Ben Wilson

未讀,
2024年2月2日 晚上8:25:542月2日
收件者:Suchan Seo、dev-secur...@mozilla.org
Dear Suchan,
You make a valid point. However, in this case, I wasn't sure how other root stores would be handling this. They may have their own processes. Also, the distribution on this list is almost 3x greater than on the CCADB public list, so I decided to post the discussion here. 
If the other root stores want to have a public discussion of this acquisition, then we can start a discussion on CCADB Public, too.
Sincerely yours,
Ben

Aaron Gable

未讀,
2024年2月6日 下午5:01:012月6日
收件者:Ben Wilson、Suchan Seo、dev-secur...@mozilla.org
e-commerce monitoring GmbH currently has multiple open bugzilla tickets which have not had any updates from their staff in multiple months:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1815534

Does the behavior of the CA being acquired factor into decisions like this, or just the behavior of the acquiring entity? If a distrust conversation were to arise in the future, how do root programs ensure that bugs filed under previous corporate names are still included in the analysis?

Thanks,
Aaron

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "dev-secur...@mozilla.org" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dev-security-po...@mozilla.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CA%2B1gtabZVUgzo1rbr%3DyP-F0YzWCzjaO1sHKGYp%3DLTtQGzYEKrA%40mail.gmail.com.

Ben Wilson

未讀,
2024年2月6日 下午6:22:362月6日
收件者:Aaron Gable、Suchan Seo、dev-secur...@mozilla.org
Hi Aaron,

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:00 PM Aaron Gable <aa...@letsencrypt.org> wrote:
e-commerce monitoring GmbH currently has multiple open bugzilla tickets which have not had any updates from their staff in multiple months:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1815534

Correct - the questions raised by these incidents still need to be answered.
 
Does the behavior of the CA being acquired factor into decisions like this, or just the behavior of the acquiring entity?

The behavior of the entity being acquired and the capabilities and history of the acquiring company are relevant, going back for an unspecified period of time. (Factors to be considered in deciding how far to go back include the nature and severity of any non-compliance and the degree to which any incidents reveal persistent, systemic problems.)
 
If a distrust conversation were to arise in the future, how do root programs ensure that bugs filed under previous corporate names are still included in the analysis?

We have not experienced a lot of M&A/name-change activity recently. I believe the Mozilla Community has sufficient continuity, institutional memory, and community-based knowledge about the history of CA operators. So, I think this concern can be handled when needed with comments from community members, and changes in the names of CA operators should not require that we create a new tracking solution. (If incidents are sufficiently recent or still have relevance, then we could update the Bugzilla bugs "Summaries" by replacing the name of the previous operator with the name of the new entity when there is a name change or CA operator replacement.)

Ben

e-commerce monitoring

未讀,
2024年2月8日 清晨7:19:332月8日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org
Dear All,

e-commerce monitoring GmbH is now 100% subsidiary of AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H., which is classified as “große Kapitalgesellschaft” (large corporation) and therefore needs to comply with all regulations of the Austrian GmbHG (limited liabilities company Act) and UGB (Commercial Code).

e-commerce monitoring GmbH was taken over as a fully functional and independent entity inside the AUSTRIA CARD group of companies. The certified policies, processes and commitments of e-commerce monitoring GmbH continue to apply.

The takeover of the company also includes the taking over of the established staff which results in no changes except top management and e-commerce monitoring GmbH will continue to adhere and operate according to the respective policies.

Best regards,
Daniel

e-commerce monitoring

未讀,
2024年2月23日 上午9:36:132月23日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、e-commerce monitoring
Preface

The only thing that changed is the ownership, and the ownership is represented by the new management. This only formal change has already been notified to the authorities and approved and registered. The rest remains unchanged.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH fulfills different trust service requirements from ISO/IEC, eIDAS / ETSI, CA/Browser Forum to Root Program requirements, remains a member of the European Trust List (EUTL) as before and is permanently monitored by the Austrian Supervisory Body (RTR/TKK) and regularly assessed by a Conformity Assessment Body.

The management has changed from Hans G. Zeger to Emmanouil Kontos and Markus Kirchmayr. The takeover of the company includes the taking over of the existing, trained and trusted staff which results in no changes except top management. e-commerce monitoring GmbH continues to provide certification and trust services according to the respective policies.

It is in the interest of AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H. that e-commerce monitoring GmbH continues to fully comply with the Browser/OS Root Store Policies.


Ownership and Governance

The ultimate beneficial owner is Nikolaos Lykos. The new shareholder of e-commerce monitoring GmbH is AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H., Nikolaos Lykos owns 77.57 % of shares in AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS AG, which is the parent company of AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H. (it is owned 100% by AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS AG).

AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS AG is a publically listed company with subsidiaries in Europe and the USA (please find more details in the prospectus on AUSTRIACARD´s website (https://www.austriacard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/AustriaCard_Prospectus_24.01.2023_FINAL.PUBLICATIONpdf.pdf)

Emmanouil Kontos is the Managing Director of the company and authorized to represent the company solely. Markus Kirchmayr is authorized to represent the company jointly with Emmanouil Kontos. Both will not take any trusted roles in the CA operations.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH is maintaining the Key Management as well as the respective roles of Key Manager and Key Custodian through the existing, trained and trusted staff

Major decisions regarding finance and management topics are made by the Managing Director Emmanouil Kontos in consultation with Markus Kirchmayr Major decisions regarding operative topics are made by the Managing Director Emmanouil Kontos in consultation with the key manager. The decision making structure can be defined as follows:

·         Define the problem or decision that needs to be madeGather information and options

·         Analyze the information and options

·         Select the best option

·         Plan for implementation

·         Implement the plan


Investment and Budget

e-commerce monitoring GmbH is now 100% subsidiary of AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H., which is classified as “große Kapitalgesellschaft” (large corporation) and therefore needs to comply with all regulations of the Austrian GmbHG (limited liabilities company Act) and UGB  (Commercial Code).

In addition e-commerce monitoring GmbH is therefore part of group of companies of AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS AG, which is also classified as “große Kapitalgesellschaft” (large corporation) and in addition is a listed company on stock exchange in Vienna and Athens. Therefore AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS AG needs to comply with all regulations of Austrian Aktiengesetz (Joint Stock Corporation Act) and Börsegesetz (Stock Exchange Act).

AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme Gesellschaft m.b.H, with over 40 years of experience in providing high security solutions, is maintaining an Information Security Management System as part of the ISO 27001 framework which is certified and audited on a regular basis. Furthermore Austria Card has established security policies and process to comply and be certified according other security standards like ISO 14298 as well as Payment Card Industry standards PCI CP, PCI DSS and a qualification management system according to ISO 9001:2015.

In the interest of fair competition we prefer not to disclose any strategic, budget or any other internal confidential information.


Community Engagement

e-commerce monitoring GmbH is committed to serving a diverse range of communities, both locally and globally. Further, we strive to create products and services that meet the needs of various demographics. Additionally, we prioritize inclusivity and accessibility, ensuring that our offerings are accessible to individuals from all walks of life.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH is actively monitoring various legal information databases, other sources like Certification Authorities and Trust Service Providers portals by ETSI, the websites of CA Browser Forum and root store operators as well as participation and exchange of information with various industry partners through events and projects.

Additionally, e-commerce monitoring GmbH has established partnerships with regulatory institutions, security researchers, certification partners as well as customer relations which pro-actively inform e-commerce monitoring GmbH regarding significant changes, requirements and risks concerning security and compliance throughout the whole Web PKI. 


Employees

e-commerce monitoring GmbH has established policies like “GLOBALTRUST Certificate Policy” which continue to apply.

For reference and directions please consult particularly sections 5.2 Procedural controls and 5.3 Personnel

There is no change to the staff in trusted roles. Employees in trusted roles remain as they have been. Only the top level management has been replaced. We are not able to disclose any background information on individuals. Skills and experience have been audited and, in part, are known to the Root Program responsible.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH employs personnel with over 30 years of experience in cryptography, data protection and in general providing PKI technology solutions.

The audited systems implemented by the trusted personnel of e-commerce monitoring GmbH are fulfilling different trust service requirements from ISO/IEC, eIDAS / ETSI, CAB Forum to root store policies which additionally are monitored on a regularly basis both through automated system and manual audit processes.

Further, e-commerce monitoring GmbH monitors CA incidents and other relevant discussions over the following community groups:

·         Bugzilla platform (https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Incident_Dashboard)

·         dev-security-policy group hosted by Google (https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy)

·         CCADB Public group hosted by Google (https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/g/public)

·         CAB Forum mailing lists:

o   https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/netsec

o   https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

o   https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/smcwg-public

o   https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/validation

o   https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg


Operational Design and Ongoing GRC Management

e-commerce monitoring GmbH are designed, built and maintained according to the requirements including but not limited to ISO/IEC, eIDAS / ETSI, CAB Forum, root store policies as well as the established policies by GLOBALTRUST. Additionally, these systems have a continuous audit history carried out by qualified accredited bodies. The most recent RootCA GLOBALTRUST 2020 has a gapless cradle-to-the-grave audit including a key ceremony report and EV readiness attestation.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH maintains extensive public and internal documentation which additionally has been presented to and audited by the Austrian supervisory body (RTR/TKK).

The audited systems enforce various automated controls and tests including but not limited to pre-issuance linting tests utilizing the well-known open source tools.

e-commerce monitoring GmbH has implemented automated monitoring systems that permanently evaluate the system security parameters, performance, availability and the resulting quality KPIs of the trusted services. Deviations from the expected quality KPIs trigger the notification and remediation process of our trained IT personnel during working hours and standby. 

Additionally, manual and automated self-audits are carried out on a quarterly basis against a random percentage of all issued certificates as required.

 

Auditing 

e-commerce monitoring GmbH will continue to be evaluated by the auditor “A-SIT Zentrum für sichere Informationstechnologie” – Austria under the eIDAS / ETSI audit scheme.

The most recent audit attestation including auditor’s accreditation scope and team qualification can be found under the provided URl and follows the ACAB-c template in its most recent version: https://www.a-sit.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/VIG-23-044_audit-attestation_globaltrust-etsi-2023_final_signed.pdf

The most recent eIDAS conformity assessment report can be found here:  https://service.globaltrust.eu/static/conformity-assessment-2023.pdf

Here is a quick bottom-up way to reproduce the auditor's qualifications:

A-SIT has been recorded as auditor in the CCADB with Audit Firm Confidence Status as evaluated by Root Store Managers “High” https://ccadb.my.site.com/s/detail/a0F1J00001ICCfqUAH 

Ben Wilson

未讀,
2024年3月5日 上午11:18:133月5日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、regist...@e-monitoring.at
All,
March 1 was the scheduled end of public discussion on this matter. However, I have one unresolved question that I have presented to the CA operator and its audit firm regarding ACAB'c membership (see MRSP section 3.2). As soon as I hear back on that question, I'll provide a summary of the entire discussion here.
Thanks,
Ben

Amir Omidi (aaomidi)

未讀,
2024年4月26日 下午2:09:204月26日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Ben Wilson、regist...@e-monitoring.at
Did you ever hear from them?

Ben Wilson

未讀,
2024年4月30日 下午5:15:414月30日
收件者:Amir Omidi (aaomidi)、dev-secur...@mozilla.org、regist...@e-monitoring.at

Hi Amir,

Here is a quick update on this issue, while I continue working on a summary of the discussion concerning the acquisition of e-commerce monitoring by AUSTRIA CARD.

Since June 1, 2022, section 3.2 of the Mozilla Root Store Policy (MRSP) has required that ETSI auditors be members of the Accredited Conformity Assessment Bodies' Council (ACAB'c). One of the underlying reasons for adopting this requirement was to ensure consistency in auditor qualifications, guidance, and attestation letters. The ACAB’c membership requirement continues to help improve the quality of ETSI audits. However, the MRSP also allows Mozilla to temporarily waive the ACAB’c membership requirement under certain circumstances.

e-commerce monitoring’s ETSI audit is currently performed by A-SIT (Secure Information Technology Center – Austria). According to Herbert Leithold, Executive Director of A-SIT, “A-SIT is a government-funded information security organisation with formal duties that require strict neutrality and independency.” For this reason, A-SIT asserts that it is precluded from joining the ACAB’c. While A-SIT is currently not a member of ACAB'c, it has otherwise met auditor qualification requirements and its audits have conformed to templates provided by the ACAB’c. 

We are considering whether to grant a temporary approval of A-SIT as an exception to the ACAB’c membership requirement. Such temporary approval would be subject to periodic re-evaluation, and likely it would eventually be withdrawn. We sincerely appreciate everyone's contributions as they facilitate our ability to make well-informed decisions. We kindly request your insightful perspectives and opinions.

Thanks,

Ben

Amir Omidi (aaomidi)

未讀,
2024年4月30日 下午5:26:554月30日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Ben Wilson、dev-secur...@mozilla.org、regist...@e-monitoring.at、Amir Omidi (aaomidi)

I do think that such a temporary grant does not make sense. e-commerce has so far not showed themselves to be a good steward of public trust. What are the implications of e-commerce being distrusted by Mozilla, especially since they can't get their auditors in order? The requirement for the auditors being part of ACAB was made nearly 2 years ago.

According to crt.sh, e-commerce has ~150 active certificates. I'm not entirely sure why an exception should be made for them & the auditor they have picked?

Thanks,
Amir

Roman Fischer

未讀,
2024年5月3日 清晨7:05:545月3日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org

Dear Ben,

 

I’m not sure I understand “A-SIT asserts that it is precluded from joining the ACAB’c” correctly. Does A-SIT have any confirmation either from their government sponsor or from ACAB’c that they can’t join?

 

Rgds
Roman

Wayne

未讀,
2024年5月3日 清晨7:29:155月3日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Roman Fischer
Having glanced at e-commerce monitoring GmbH for all of 5 minutes I'd move further and advocate for full removal: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1862004#c10

They don't list valid/expired/revoked domains for all of their sub-CAs, and even the ones they do are running on the same wildcard covering:



This is not a healthy CA in any manner.

- Wayne

Rob Stradling

未讀,
2024年5月3日 上午8:47:525月3日
收件者:Wayne、dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Roman Fischer
Hi Wayne.  On this particular point...

> They don't list valid/expired/revoked domains for all of their sub-CAs

Please note that the requirement in BR section 2.2 is as follows (emphasis mine):

"The CA SHALL host test Web pages that allow Application Software Suppliers to test their software
with Subscriber Certificates that chain up to each publicly trusted Root Certificate. At a minimum,
the CA SHALL host separate Web pages using Subscriber Certificates that are
i. valid,
ii. revoked, and
iii. expired."

https://crt.sh/test-websites shows that e-commerce monitoring GmbH is currently compliant with this requirement.

I don't think you'll find many CAs that operate a separate set of valid/expired/revoked "test Web pages" for each of their Sub-CAs, given that this is not actually required.



Subject: Re: Public Discussion of Acquisition of e-commerce monitoring GmbH by AUSTRIA CARD-Plastikkarten und Ausweissysteme GmbH
 
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Wayne

未讀,
2024年5月3日 上午8:53:425月3日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Rob Stradling、Roman Fischer、Wayne
Thanks for the clarification Rob. Looking at their page layout and their opting to do so convinced me of that, but I should have checked the BR specifically.

- Wayne

Andrew Ayer

未讀,
2024年5月3日 上午8:59:595月3日
收件者:Wayne、dev-secur...@mozilla.org
Hi Wayne,

On Fri, 3 May 2024 04:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Wayne <rdau...@gmail.com> wrote:

> They don't list valid/expired/revoked domains for all of their
> sub-CAs

CAs are only required to provide one set of test websites per root, not
for every sub-CA.

> and even the ones they do are running on the same wildcard
> covering:
>
> DNS:timestamp.globaltrust.eu
> DNS:*.globaltrust.eu
> DNS:*.globaltrust.at
> DNS:*.globaltrust.info
> DNS:*.a-cert.at
> DNS:*.e-monitoring.at
>
> See: https://crt.sh/?id=9532011580

Where are you seeing this disclosed as a test website certificate? The
disclosures that I see in the CCADB for GLOBALTRUST's Mozilla-trusted
root are:

https://testok-2020-server-qualified-ev-1.e-monitoring.at/
https://testold-2020-server-qualified-ev-1.e-monitoring.at/
https://testrevoked-2020-server-qualified-ev-1.e-monitoring.at/

Those all look correct to me.

Regards,
Andrew

Wayne

未讀,
2024年5月3日 上午9:12:195月3日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Andrew Ayer、dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Wayne
Hi Andrew,

I was looking at https://globaltrust.eu/certificate-policy/ and the 'GLOBALTRUST 2015 SERVER OV 2' entry which includes a list of test servers. I can see there is a different list of test servers listed higher on the page, and 2020 functions correctly, but 2015 has the same issue (from the 'Testserver SSL-Zertifikate' heading):

GLOBALTRUST 2015 gültiges Zertifikat https://testok-2015-server-qualified-1.e-monitoring.at
GLOBALTRUST 2015 abgelaufenes Zertifikat https://testold-2015-server-qualified-1.e-monitoring.at
GLOBALTRUST 2015 widerrufenes Zertifikat https://testrevoked-2015-server-qualified-1.e-monitoring.at

This seems to have been an abandoned practice by globaltrust and the entries are inconsistent on whether they have any listed.

- Wayne

Amir Omidi (aaomidi)

未讀,
2024年5月7日 下午3:24:175月7日
收件者:dev-secur...@mozilla.org、Wayne、Andrew Ayer、dev-secur...@mozilla.org
I just wanted to point out that e-commerce's communication is still very-very delayed: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893546#c1, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1862004#c9

I think e-commerce is getting into the territory where we should really consider if they're a healthy member of the Mozilla root store.

Does anyone have any arguments on why e-commerce shouldn't be fast tracked to removal from root stores? I know in the future we probably need to define certain criteria on how to handle non-responsive CAs such as this. But I don't think we should wait until such a document is prepared before taking action.
回覆所有人
回覆作者
轉寄
0 則新訊息