Summary:
Focus:
Impact of climate change on the distribution of species
Impact of species migration on regional eco-dynamics and biodiversity
Key idea:
Each species has a preferred band of environments: habitats, temperatures, etc.
Environments move in space due to climate change; different speeds for various environments and species
This causes new species to come into contact with each other
Focus area: Alpine environments
Interesting because changes in elevation have a big impact on change in a short horizontal distance
Warming climate causes more temperate species to move to higher elevations
Observing low-land plants coming into contact with highland plants
Approach:
Take plants that are expected to move close to each other, move them together
Move high-land plants to warmer climates in lower elevations: take a layer of soil with all the grass and flowers and move it
Experimental results show that moved plants survive worse in their new community
Question: how long does the impact of climate change on plant communities take?
Study area:
Calanda mountain, Switzerland
Elevation 1000m-2000m, 5°C difference
Track test plots of plants growing over time
2D photos that document individual plants and their size
Observe death, growth, recruitment (new plant) events across all species
Train a statistical model of these 3 processes for each species conditional on interactions with other species, temperature
Given this model, can forecast evolution of plant communities under different climate conditions
Century-scale forecasts of plant community evolution
Forecast of whole-habitat diversity projections
Insects create a faster dynamic since they move much faster than plants
When they move to a warming area they are able to attach plant species that no defense against them
Analyzing this interaction is ongoing work
Modeling interaction between climate change and plant communities and the animals that live with them?
Novel competitive interactions -> species
Impact of land-based climate mitigation
Carbon removal via tech (direct air capture) or nature (reforestation)
Focus: impact of nature-based carbon removal on ecosystems
Forest management/reforestation
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage, Biochar
Soil Carbon
Enhanced Chemical Weathering
Nature-based carbon removal (Reforestation, afforestation, bioenergy cropping) affects ecosystems
Land Based Mitigation Strategy (LBMS) -> Habitat conversion -> Biodiversity
Approach:
LBMS -> changing local environment
Use MaxEnt species distribution models to predict changing range of species (e.g. moose) under various climate scenarios
Using downscaled climate model predictions under various emission and carbon removal scenarios
Use of LBMS modifies regional habitats (more forest, more grassland, etc.)
Use MaxEnt to predict how the modification affects the range of different species
E.g. adding forest is good for moose, bad for field mice.
Combination of changing LBMS impacts and change in global mean temperature affects species in complex ways
Predicting impact of afforestation/reforestation on habitat
Africa, Cerrado in Brazil: reduction in habitat area
North America, South America, Europe, China: increase in habitats
i.e. adding trees to historically forested biomes increases biodiversity
Intuition: lions or other savanna species will be harmed by forests
Effect via climate stabilization is smaller but consistently positive
Prediction impact of bioenergy crops on habitats
Generally worse for habitats, especially for historically forested regions
India and China: improved biodiversity
Effect via climate stabilization is larger than for forests and also consistently positive
Produced regional recommendations for which technique (trees or bioenergy crops) to prefer when optimizing for biodiversity
In many cases its better to leave the current ecosystem intact