We have an email ballot. Votes are due to the LNC Business List on this email thread by 11:59 pm Pacific Time on November 3, 2023.
Motion: Move that Austin Padgett’s contract be extended for 3 months from the initial contract’s end date.
Co-Sponsors: Haman, Hayes, Malagon, Watkins
Vote Threshold Required: Majority
You can track the progress of votes here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/127e84AAeIh2dGNtJgN-vlEDkcGfMY9v3/edit#gid=1442753127
Please advise me of any discrepancies.
I struggled with this vote. But I am voting yes, and have extended rationale why. It will anger some people (not on LNC) and frankly my dear, in the words of Rhett Butler, I don’t give a damn.
I am an individualist. The fact of someone’s relationship- if disclosed so any issues can be monitored – is a vacuous reason TO ME to put aside meritocracy. We are a DC corporation, and even DC corporate law does not prohibit such transactions provided there is full disclosure… and… it is in the best interests of the corporation.
That last part is where I struggled.
It is undisputed we have had a financial springback, and that Mr. Padgett was part of that. I realize the LNC has information that the general membership does not have, but that is part of governance and laws and policies regarding staff. On the financial front, to me, it is without a doubt that a short term extension is in the best interest of the corporation.
However, despite my position on related parties, it is also undisputed that some Party members have misgivings. And at first that was weighty. I was either going to abstain or vote no because of that. What changed my mind? A post today that was posed as a scurrilous and calumnious “hypothetical” accusing us of getting several large donors to just buy membership as a national party after the same person went on a rant accusing the LNC of antisemitism, and same person accused us of being “pro Russia” before, and I am sure will find some way to say we are pro-Hamas now. Frankly I am sick and tired of coddling this defamatory bullshit. If such people are upset I DON’T CARE. I realize that there is a segment of good faith people who will disagree, and I have heard you and I respect you. But by far the loudest voices are those who are not in good faith towards us but are actually upset we have had a fantastic financial month. That sealed it for me. Nothing would please them but our destruction (and they delighted in violating my rights under our Bylaws), and I have no obligation to cater to them, and I will not. This sick behaviour in the Party needs to stop, and I will not enable it. This Party fell on its face on COVID under the watch of people like that. We refused to stand up for freedom of association and stand strongly against the political violence of the BLM riots. Literal communists felt comfortable running for Party Chair, and the LNC could not bring itself to affirm private property rights.
So yes. Those who by their deeds and action delight in cruelty and mal-wishes are not working for the best interests of the corporation. I am duty-bound to.
So weighing the concerns the choice is clear FOR ME. I utterly respect the opinions of my fellow LNC members who might vote differently. I treasure our relationships.
I vote yes.
Thank you for all your hard work Austin.
PS: Let the social media malice fly! I won't see it. I fill my life with that which brings joy.
On 27 Oct 2023, at 19:32, Bill Redpath <bill.r...@lp.org> wrote:
Hello all,
Had the party's financials remained status quo following the initial contract, there would be no way I would vote to extend. However, the recent results can’t be denied, especially given a $170,000 October, and all accounts are that Austin played a major role in that. After talking with him, I'm persuaded his talents would make these successes sustainable, and that he could even build upon what's already been done.
It’s pretty clear that he is indispensable in this role, and can’t be spared right now, especially as we approach costly ballot access fights in many states. I would go as far as to say it would be financially irresponsible NOT to extend him.
I vote yes.
On 31 Oct 2023, at 19:09, Dave Benner <dave....@lp.org> wrote:
I struggled with this vote. But I am voting yes, and have extended rationale why. It will anger some people (not on LNC) and frankly my dear, in the words of Rhett Butler, I don’t give a damn.
I am an individualist. The fact of someone’s relationship- if disclosed so any issues can be monitored – is a vacuous reason TO ME to put aside meritocracy. We are a DC corporation, and even DC corporate law does not prohibit such transactions provided there is full disclosure… and… it is in the best interests of the corporation.
That last part is where I struggled.
It is undisputed we have had a financial springback, and that Mr. Padgett was part of that. I realize the LNC has information that the general membership does not have, but that is part of governance and laws and policies regarding staff. On the financial front, to me, it is without a doubt that a short term extension is in the best interest of the corporation.
However, despite my position on related parties, it is also undisputed that some Party members have misgivings. And at first that was weighty. I was either going to abstain or vote no because of that. What changed my mind? A post today that was posed as a scurrilous and calumnious “hypothetical” accusing us of getting several large donors to just buy membership as a national party after the same person went on a rant accusing the LNC of antisemitism, and same person accused us of being “pro Russia” before, and I am sure will find some way to say we are pro-Hamas now. Frankly I am sick and tired of coddling this defamatory bullshit. If such people are upset I DON’T CARE. I realize that there is a segment of good faith people who will disagree, and I have heard you and I respect you. But by far the loudest voices are those who are not in good faith towards us but are actually upset we have had a fantastic financial month. That sealed it for me. Nothing would please them but our destruction (and they delighted in violating my rights under our Bylaws), and I have no obligation to cater to them, and I will not. This sick behaviour in the Party needs to stop, and I will not enable it. This Party fell on its face on COVID under the watch of people like that. We refused to stand up for freedom of association and stand strongly against the political violence of the BLM riots. Literal communists felt comfortable running for Party Chair, and the LNC could not bring itself to affirm private property rights.
So yes. Those who by their deeds and action delight in cruelty and mal-wishes are not working for the best interests of the corporation. I am duty-bound to.
So weighing the concerns the choice is clear FOR ME. I utterly respect the opinions of my fellow LNC members who might vote differently. I treasure our relationships.
I vote yes.
Thank you for all your hard work Austin.
PS: Let the social media malice fly! I won't see it. I fill my life with that which brings joy.
___________________________________________________In Liberty, Caryn Ann HarlosLNC Secretary and LP Historical Preservation Committee Chair ~ 561.523.2250
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:34 PM Secretary LNC <secr...@lp.org> wrote:We have an email ballot. Votes are due to the LNC Business List on this email thread by 11:59 pm Pacific Time on November 3, 2023.
Motion: Move that Austin Padgett’s contract be extended for 3 months from the initial contract’s end date.
Co-Sponsors: Haman, Hayes, Malagon, Watkins
Vote Threshold Required: Majority
You can track the progress of votes here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/127e84AAeIh2dGNtJgN-vlEDkcGfMY9v3/edit#gid=1442753127
Please advise me of any discrepancies.
___________________________________________________In Liberty, Caryn Ann HarlosLNC Secretary and LP Historical Preservation Committee Chair ~ 561.523.2250
The Motion PASSED with a vote count of 10-4-1-2.
Voting Aye: Benner, Blankenship, Ford, Haman, Harlos, Hays, Malagon, Rufo, Watkins, Yeniscavich
Voting No: Hagopian, Nekhaila, Tuniewicz, Vest
Express Abstentions: Dassing
No Vote Recorded: McArdle, Nanna