Point of Order 1. The proposed motion is out of order on the ground that it purports to include evidence. Such evidence and claims may be presented privately to the LNC, and in notice to the accused. RONR at 62:2 to consider requires this to be discussed in executive session.
Point of Order 2. The ruling of the chair of June 22, 2021, based on earlier precedent, requires five days’ notice per charge is required. This motion includes at least four claimed offenses.1 Therefore, 20 days’ notice is required.
1 These are claimed to be:
Violation of Section 5.01 Subsection I (Social Media Policy Page 68)
Violation of Section 2.01 Subsection 2 (Conflict of Interest Page 23)
Violation of Section 2.01 Subsection 5 (Harassment and Offensive Behavior Prohibition Page 25)
A general charge that the secretary demonstrates “unfitness for office.”
I will note that I cannot possibly prepare an adequate defense in this short of time. The original motion to suspend was back in June and I find it uncredible that it was just decided to keep pursuing so it seems like it is possible that a last-minute ambush was conducted. If I am forced to provide a defense in such a short time, I am going to have not start the new job I have on Monday which will seriously hurt me financially. Just giving facts here. These continued attempts to frankly ruin all my work of multiple years have already had a lot of negative impact, I would ask that ruining me financially right now not be added to that last. That would be great. I know that is nothing to do with points of order but has to do with basic fairness and justice.
Whitney Bilyeu
LP | Chair
LP.org