Not challenging, but seeking clarity on what needs to happen to P1 "to be made to have it fit into current structure" ... caught part of that post-meeting discussion last night, but not the full gist.
Sat down to try to reconcile P and P1 into a single document, then realized I'm not sure what's desired.
What's intended as to those two proposals and/or making P1 better fit into the ?
...
On the agenda order between R - Ranked Choice Voting and P1 - Allow Electronic Balloting ... right now I don't have a strong preference either way. Noting that in my current ranking I have R - Ranked Choice Voting ahead of P1 - Allow Electronic Balloting, but acknowledging Dr. Moulton's and Chair Harlos's preference that P1 - Allow Electronic Balloting be considered before R - Ranked Choice Voting. Agreeing that they should be grouped in proximity to one another.
A concern is that P1 - Allow Electronic Balloting would seem to be a greater cognitive lift for delegates (especially new ones), and especially if elements of P - Balloting Rules Rewrite are incorporated into it, which would argue in favor of considering R - Ranked Choice Voting before P1 - Allow Electronic Balloting.
In liberty,
Rob Latham