Sub-team repot for next week's workshop

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Lubell, Joshua (Fed)

unread,
Sep 13, 2019, 5:23:33 PM9/13/19
to scap-dev-authoring

Hi all,

Here’s a draft. What I did was take Charles’s example and expanded it. My additions are in italics.

Please let me know your feedback.

Thanks,

Josh

 

Joshua Lubell

Systems Integration Division

National Institute of Standards and Technology

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8260

Gaithersburg MD 20899-8260 USA

 

September Workshop Subteam XCCDF Report.pptx

Gabriel Alford

unread,
Sep 13, 2019, 6:11:45 PM9/13/19
to Lubell, Joshua (Fed), scap-dev-authoring
I would probably add the following for RFE'ing XCCDF unless the list of enhancements were for reference (don't remember).

  • Profile-based rule ordering
  • As another RFE, it would fix a lot of problems on we [Red Hat] run into that rule ordering in a profile be obeyed by the scan itself. In other words, how I order the rules in a profile is the order in which a scan runs if a profile is selected. Otherwise, follow the behavior we have today.

Of course a preference would be to have the XCCDF content in GitHub and have all RFEs able to be fixed and worked on by multiple people.

Gabriel Alford

Member of the technical staff

office of the chief technologist

red hat Public Sector

Red Hat

ral...@redhat.com    T: 972-707-6483    M: 303-550-7234    



--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scap-dev-author...@list.nist.gov
Visit this group at https://list.nist.gov/scap-dev-authoring
---
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scap-dev-author...@list.nist.gov.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages