Re: [pqc-forum] Abridged summary of pqc-forum@list.nist.gov - 8 updates in 1 topic

150 views
Skip to first unread message

Tushar Patel

unread,
Sep 11, 2025, 10:02:21 AM (5 days ago) Sep 11
to pqc-...@list.nist.gov
Though unrelated, there are other challenges relating to using floating point which can be hardware, software, software emulation forcing NIST to then include the specific FPU /IEEE /ISO precision types in CAVP and CMVP and also then a complete new set of requirements on sub components like SSE, AVX versions and also related to complete functionality within Enclaves ( or equivalents like common/approved enclave instruction sets), RTL, etc. Finally, it will be required to validate Software modules to make sure the floating point instructions do not extend beyond the SW or HW license ( my prediction is that we would need to start such testing to prevent future multi year licensing court cases so that business can function with the least IP related stress, slip-ins leading to vulnerabilities ( for lack of a more precise adversarial term) )

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 8:07 PM <pqc-...@list.nist.gov> wrote:
niux_d...@icloud.com: Sep 09 05:31PM +0800

My two cents here:
 
Make integer/fixed-point arithmetic Gaussian sampler a 'baseline' choice for implementations and specify in sufficient detail for secure and portable implementation.
...more
niux_d...@icloud.com: Sep 10 06:42AM +0800

I guess what I mean is: since we aim for crypto algorithm agility, crypto API agility, we might as well also aim for crypto implementation *technique* agility.
 
So the disclaimer: I'm not a ...more
dustin...@nist.gov <dustin...@nist.gov>: Sep 10 11:02AM -0700

All,
 

 
NIST seeks to make our cryptographic standards as self-contained contained
as possible. We are happy to share that for FIPS 206, the draft standard
for FN-DSA (Falcon), we have ...more
Sophie Schmieg <ssch...@google.com>: Sep 10 11:50AM -0700


> Cheers,
> -markku
 
> Consider adding support for exp in particular, that is fairly tricky to
get right otherwise, unless the spec specifically talks about what
algorithm to use to avoid ...more
Sophie Schmieg <ssch...@google.com>: Sep 10 11:58AM -0700

Oh and, div. Basically go through the FN-DSA spec and look at all the
floating point operations required that I needed to dust off my old
numerical analysis lecture notes for, I'd much rather have ...more
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu>: Sep 10 07:03PM

Wouldn't it still be better to ditch the Floating Point?
 

 
Regards,
 
Uri
 
Secure Resilient Systems and Technologies
 
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
 
On Sep 10, 2025, at 14:59, 'Sophie Schmieg' ...more
Sophie Schmieg <ssch...@google.com>: Sep 10 12:08PM -0700

Definitely, but at that point you are no longer talking about Falcon. I'm
just pointing to the specific, very difficult to implement in constant
time, algorithms that are used in the spec. ...more
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu>: Sep 10 08:52PM

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
 
Definitely, but at that point you are no longer talking about Falcon.
 
I’d rather have a strong and validate-able algorithm/standard, than try to preserve the minutia of ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to pqc-forum+...@list.nist.gov.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages