Rodrigo,
It seems the coupling is working fine.
This is easily verified by replacing the signal from your algorithm with a simple constant of 1.
As done in the cottage example, you should also connect the HRV flows of Type667 to the same terminal, i.e., 28, so they receive a positive value from CONTAM.
I’m guessing there is an issue with your control algorithm.
It always results in a value of 0 being sent to the HRV terminals for the coupled simulation and 0.3 or 0.6 for the CONTAM-only simulation (I only looked at January).
I did not evaluate your HRV algorithm, but the Radon concentrations are much different between the coupled and CONTAM-only simulations.
Concentrations are on the order of 200 to over 1000 Bq/m3 for the coupled simulation and 30 to 150 in the CONTAM-only simulation.
I had to run the simulation with a different weather file and regenerate the proforma, but I don’t think this should make too much difference in identifying the issue.
Flows from Terminal 1 were not always zero in simulations that I ran.
- Stuart
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
contam+un...@list.nist.gov
View this message at https://list.nist.gov/contam