Re: BLOCKCHAIN VOTING::"a wave of corporate takeovers" that follow the Wikipedia revolution; that completes the American "one" ...

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam Marshall Dobrin

unread,
Sep 16, 2024, 4:42:12 PM9/16/24
to SISTEEN SPIRIT, Rayce Chastity and Warlox, Xm, Wax, a...@fromthemachine.org, CONTACT A REPORTER

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 3:21 PM Adam Marshall Dobrin <ad...@holies.org> wrote:
image.png

Blockchain technology, online voting, and collaboration on document creation and connecting "concurrent version control" and "Wikipedia data on Arweave" will bring us quickly to a world that starts seeing corporate bylaws rewritten by shareholders; opening "board seats" and connections between inter-competing companies like Lockheed and Boeing (for instance) as well as their employees and their vendors in order to "streamline and create efficiencies "of unfathomable increase in use" just by connecting something like the ancient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiere to https://aragon.org/ ... and literally linking "HR and ERP" to new kinds of relationships between linear "intra-" and "inter-" industry connections between companies who interact with each other. 

We are literally staring at "because I've been saying it over and over" someone else has pulled a paper out of the cookie jar genie thing; "some times referred to as Mozilla Greasemonkey" or "The People"; and as the documents below move us to connect how "creating collaborative documents and legislation" link to something like the OMB and "executive branch implementation" of the legislation; all of these things will paradigm shift not just how the Federal government "actually accomplishes the things the people legislate" but also will increase "efficiencies" and "synergies" between companies, and inside departments of larger ones that will create an unfathomable decrease in 'labor costs and effort' and increase in "actually getting what we want and need." a.k.a "anything.'
It's taken ChatGPT actually writing this legislation to bring the First and Second Continental Congress'es to their proverbial "and the ground trembled, and the nations stared in awe" at the idea that the American Revolution is an LCN ... "a Paperclip" for what this timeperiod is doing right now; just like the Hanging Gardens of Hammurabi and the "first written law that made Baylon Great" are literally related specifically to Leviticus and the Constitution of the United States; that "you will have to Amend here" as I've repeatedly echoed and chided is the point of Revelation, Leviticus, Babylon, and the "Continental Congresses" for something like 10 years.  It's become ever more apparent as the Third Continental Congress was "created out of the blue" and the old Rock of Ages that taught us about the Second, in 1988 has vanished.

It's probably not a great sign that the place I lived in for a series of "centuries is what it meant to me, living in Tartarus where" or ... "irregardless" the point of the matter is we have a series of "very strange discrepancies" between LOC.gov and history.gov; discussing why there's a "Articles of Confederation" staring at the Third Continental Congress and the "First" appears to have occurred now before the DOI that "is the nation's birthday."  These things are glaring shining glowing bright ... "little notices" that there is a problem bigger than The Twitter Files and Deflate Gate; and we are not going to "get to the solution" without fixing "the free press" and "the freedom of the people, here."

You may not feel like slaves; or maybe that's what "you're not happy about" but you can't seem to grasp "the importance of the CVL token" and what it would have meant for something like Wikipedia and Hypothes.is on Blockchain; "auto-archiving" newspaper articles and websites as people commented on them, verisioning them, and storing them in the "bulletproof blockchain."  We'd be much closer to understanding "this haze" with something like "Dissenter.com" on "Buildr.farcaster" actually "working" in a place where the best example we have is a coalition of educational institutions that work with a small software company whose database is also "closed and hard to access and view" just like Wikipedia.

Were they to have a robust Reddit like interface and "infrastructure for getting eyes on important news" we would be ... above and beyond being "enslaved to the propaganda" of the Facebook/Instagram/Twitter "strange machines of robotic like inquiry" into just how the population and their sentiment can be most easily swayed.  What kind of "sharing and forwarding" works best, Heart this, Upvote that, downvotes? Nested Comments?

Honestly versioning, and inheritance of conversations--linking together shared Faceook posts and their nested conversations with tweets related to it, seeing that in "all one place," like u3.xyz or u2.cia ... and having it "connect across social networks and bring everything into one "series of competitors" making frontents like that--rather than the old "almost backwards" spam-push software that would just let you post the same article across every social network, and not care ..


image.png


image.png


Next in our series of permaweb partnerships, we’re delighted to announce that we’ve teamed up with wiki-based encyclopedia Everipedia — a project involving founders from Wikipedia and Genius.com. We’ll be storing the wealth of knowledge that Everipedia preserves on the Arweave, and together, we strive to forever preserve human history on the permaweb.

What is Everipedia?

Everipedia is the largest online English encyclopedia, modernised and re-designed for the digital age; it is similar to Wikipedia except all information is stored and incentivised on a blockchain (as opposed to the hierarchal model that Wikipedia has where users have certain privileges over others). The Everipedia editing interface makes creating and editing wiki’s as easy as using Facebook, and enables users to publish pages containing links, pictures, and videos. Like Wikipedia, Everipedia heavily relies on contributors from all over the world.

The decentralised nature of Everipedia means that users in Turkey, Iran, or China are, for the first time, able to access a plethora of knowledge that has previously been denied; Everipedia has Wikipedia imported and therefore it encompasses all of Wikipedia’s English language content, and much more. Just like Arweave, Everipedia is serverless and there are no gatekeepers controlling the narrative of human knowledge — anybody can make a page, as long as it’s well cited.

Enabling the knowledge economy

Community members are held accountable for submissions to Everipedia but unlike Wikipedia — where thousands of editors labour for free — Everipedia’s editors get an incentive from the points system, whereby creating articles and approved edits amasses “IQ.” Using EOS blockchain technology, Everipedia converts IQ scores to a token-based currency, giving all existing editors an allotment proportionate to their IQ — and giving them a real, financial stake in the platform.

To prevent bad actors from trying to cash in with ill-founded or deliberately false articles and edits, Everipedia require users to put up a token of their own in order to submit. If their work is accepted, they get their tokens back, plus a little bit extra for their contributions; if not, their tokens get slashed, which essentially means it takes longer for the tokens to be returned to their account to reuse. All holders of IQ are incentivised to create quality, neutral content and to work together in building the reputation of the network.

The model aims to make feasible a fully-autonomous encyclopedia that does not need to rely on advertisements or donations.

Current state

Already, we’re storing the articles that account for 80% of the Everipedia traffic on the permaweb and as the wealth of knowledge on the platform grows, we look forward to being part of the mission to preserve human history for future generations.

Want to help guarantee the safety of humanity’s knowledge and earn tokens at the same time? Why not try running an Arweave node!

UNTO US A CHILD WILL BENEDICT IV JPC IV

Timeline of Events

A timeline of events for this wiki

Date Founded

July 31, 2017

Arweave was first announced in August 2017 as Archain by Sam Williams and William Jones

Official Launch

May 31, 2018

Arweave was officially launched in June 2018

$5 Million Funding

October 31, 2019

On November 6, 2019, Arweave secured $5 Million in a seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz and contributions from Union Square Ventures and Multicoin Capital

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/arweave/

image.png
 it
I hope they didn't waste their money; but at this point iq.wiki is filled with all the same "jazz©rap" that Mirror.xyz is filled with; a bunch of nonsense gibberish from the people making and testing "half working blockchain software" rather than having an Aegis of a clue and taking what is on medium.com and other blogging platforms and mirroring it on Mirror.xyz--which would (again) significantly increase the value of Arweave and the fortification of history and "words" that we are very much attempting not to lose.  This is the same schpiel i went through discussing "just yesterday (iiterally) half discussing on camera video's that were being shut off by interstitial monsters walking by and "making my phone too hot to record" ...

A consortium of geniuses have two options; you can either "actually pay the 50k per langage" to etch Wikipedia in to Arweave, after investing in it, obviously; and watch the 50k and the investment skyrocket; or we could sit down and try and talk to those people, or just "fork the thing with Irys" for instance, and build the kind of Coloroda Google "spanner sharding" ssystem that it needs; to verify node uptime and bandwidth and utilize those statistics in order to "pay nodes" for services like running a "arweave node in your college dorm room" where a series of those around the world would build " a stronger and more robust infrastructure than" for instance all of Amazon and Azure/Microsoft have combined; almost overnight. 

This is something like what NNTP is; though it's not very clear what kind of college infrastructure even knows they are running "ancient news servers" that are being used for data storage across the ... "see OnChain and BlockChain are "on internets" and the internets are linked by ..." something like Link, typing to something like "Cherubim" and without this place you have "no continuity of structure" and things like Ecuador and World War I turning into the "Vatican's Inquisition" into where Port Isabell comes into the quest to understand what happened to

REMEMBER REMEMBER THE FIFTH OF NOVEMBER, THE GUNPOWDER TREASON AND PLOT

and what that has to do with the "actual ancients of my day" in a Triceratops answer to yesterday's question; I was an "original generation X programmer" working with Microsoft and Apple and (((( tandy ))) and QBASIC, Visual Basic 3, Delphi, Kylix ... and those sorts of interfaces before i moved on and learned the details and connection between "regression analysis" Postfix, Postgres, Oracle "stored procedures" and MS-SQL Server 2000; MyISAM tables and the building of MySQL.  In the days before that there were people programming in languages like COBOL and Fortran and Lisp; "back when God's Pre-Grace" was debugging punch card systems and learning about the "mainframes" the historical memory of recollection here insists Mitocondria and Mitosis suggest were "Mitsubishi MIT created" for the Apollo missions.

I'd like us to programatically moving past Chrome V8 NODE based "too much stuff" and get back to the really cool looking "Scala on a Java VM" and Rust; which appears to be "way more solid than solidity" ... just glancing at things, those are my feelings; I'd rewrite the Arweave server, which is created in some obscure language called Erlang; into something ... simpler to install.


image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png
image.png


References1.Germann M, Serdu ̈ lt U. Internet voting and turnout: evidence fromSwitzerland.Elect Stud2017;47:1–12.2.Dandoy R. The impact of e-voting on turnout: insights from the belgiancase,29–37.ISBN:978-3-907589-17-5.DOI:10.1109/ICEDEG.2014.6819940.3.Goodman N, Stokes LC. Reducing the cost of voting: an evaluation ofinternet voting’s effect on turnout.Br J Polit Sci2020;50:1155–67.4.Stewart K, Taylor J.Online voting: the solution to declining political en-gagement?, 2018. https://www.rand.org/blog/2018/03/online-voting-the-solution-to-declining-political-engagement.html[https://perma.cc/DTY4-F54U] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).5.Serdu ̈ lt U, Germann M, Harris Met al.Who are the internet voters?. In:Tambouris Eet al.(ed.),Electronic Government and Electronic Participation.Innovation and the Public Sector. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2015, 27–41.ISBN: 9781614995692. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-570-8-27.6.Pew Research Center.Mobile Fact Sheet, 12 June 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile[https://perma.cc/9DFC-G3LG] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).7.Jefferson D, Buell D, Skoglund K,et al. What We Don’t Know About theVoatz “Blockchain” Internet Voting System, 2019. https://cse.sc.edu/buell/blockchain-papers/documents/WhatWeDontKnowAbouttheVoatz_Blockchain_.pdf[https://web.archi-ve.org/web/20200622152400/https://verifiedvoting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/What-We-Dont-Know-About-the-Voatz-Blockchain-Internet-Voting-System.pdf] (6 November 2020, date last accessed).8.Juels A, Eyal I, Naor O. Blockchains won’t fix internet voting security -and could make it worse.The Conversation, 2018. http://theconversation.com/blockchains-wont-fix-internet-voting-security-and-could-make-it-worse-104830[https://perma.cc/2VQQ-25H9] (6 January2021, date last accessed).9.Barber G. Wouldn’t it be great if people could vote on the blockchain?, 2019.https://www.wired.com/story/wouldnt-it-be-great-if-people-could-vote-on-blockchain [https://perma.cc/CR6P-RMZJ](6 January 2021, date last accessed).10. Grauer Y.What Really Happened with West Virginia’s BlockchainVoting Experiment?, 2019 https://slate.com/technology/2019/07/west-virginia-blockchain-voting-voatz.html[https://perma.cc/H9M5-YJSV](6 January 2021, date last accessed).11. West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office.24 Counties to Offer MobileVoting Option for Military Personnel Overseas. https://sos.wv.gov/news/Pages/09-20-2018-A.aspx[https://perma.cc/CX3E-YBPQ] (6 January2021, date last accessed).12. West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office.Warner Pleased withParticipation in Test Pilot for Mobile Voting. https://sos.wv.gov/news/Pages/11-16-2018-A.aspx[https://perma.cc/7VDD-PZFP] (6 January2021, date last accessed).13. Glen Mills. Utah county clerk says mobile voting pilot program was asuccess.ABC4, 2019. https://www.abc4.com/news/utah-county-clerk-says-mobile-voting-pilot-program-was-a-success[https://perma.cc/AN2G-ZVFU] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).14. Selsky A.2 Oregon counties offer vote-by-mobile to overseas voters.APNews, 2019. https://apnews.com/8ce0fbc400514f55839fa84fb364d7f4(6 January 2021, date last accessed).15. Specter MA, Koppel J, Weitzner D.The Ballot Is Busted before theBlockchain: A Security Analysis of Voatz, the First Internet VotingApplication Used in U.S. Federal elections, August 2020. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/specter[https://perma.cc/2B42-REEN] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).12Journal of Cybersecurity, 2021, Vol. 00, No. 0Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/7/1/tyaa025/6137886 by Robert Gibbons on 05 October 202116. Official Website of the Mayor of Moscow.fflÅkjvanüyeküÅz,necnbhjdanü:ghjuhavvbcnßghjdehznyale;yjcnüýkernhjyyjujujkjcjdaybz.https://www.mos.ru/news/item/58866073 (6 January 2021, date lastaccessed).17. Moscow Technologies. moscow-technologies/blockchain-voting.GitHub.https://github.com/moscow-technologies/blockchain-voting[https://perma.cc/LL8M-6GN2] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).18. Krivonosova J. Internet voting in russia: how?.Medium, 2019. https://medium.com/@juliakrivonosova/internet-voting-in-russia-how-9382db4da71f[https://perma.cc/EP9B-K6B7] (6 January 2021, date lastaccessed).19. Official Website of the Mayor of Moscow. kernhjyyßedß,jhßdŒjcrjdcreþujhjlcreþLeve. https://www.mos.ru/city/projects/blockchain-vybory[https://perma.cc/XZB4-FD9F] (6 January 2021, date lastaccessed).20. Gaudry P, Golovnev A. Breaking the encryption scheme of the Moscowinternet voting system.Proc. Financial Cryptography ’20. http://fc20.ifca.ai/preproceedings/178.pdf (6 January 2021, date last accessed).21. Beedham M. Japan is experimenting with a blockchain-powered votingsystem. The Next Web, 2018. https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/09/03/japan-city-blockchain-voting [https://perma.cc/A9AU-KA74] (6January 2021, date last accessed).22. swissinfo.ch.Switzerland’s First Municipal Blockchain Vote Hailed aSuccess,2018.https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/crypto-valley-_-switzerland-s-first-municipal-blockchain-vote-hailed-a-success/44230928[https://perma.cc/632Z-BP6M] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).23. Blaze M, Braun J, Hursti Het al. DEF CON 26 Voting Village: Reporton Cyber Vulnerabilities in U.S. Election Equipment, Databases, andInfrastructure, 2018. https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-26/DEF%20CON%2026%20voting%20village%20report.pdf(6January2021, date last accessed).24. Blaze M, Hursti H, MacAlpine Met al. DEF CON 27 Voting MachineHacking Village, 2019. https://media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2027/voting-village-report-defcon27.pdf (6 January 2021, date last accessed).25. Blaze M, Braun J, Hursti Het al. DEFCON 25 Voting Machine HackingVillage: Report on Cyber Vulnerabilities in U.S. Election Equipment,Databases, and Infrastructure, 2017. https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-25/DEF%20CON%2025%20voting%20village%20report.pdf (6January 2021, date last accessed).26. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Election Security. https://www.dhs.gov/topic/election-security[https://perma.cc/2PRL-EMYS](6January 2021, date last accessed).27. Tatham M. Identity theft statistics.Experian. https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/identity-theft-statistics[https://perma.cc/3UEB-JLW5] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).28. Equifax. Equifax Releases Details on Cybersecurity Incident, AnnouncesPersonnel Changes, September 2017. https://investor.equifax.com/news-and-events/news/2017/09-15-2017-224018832[https://perma.cc/6AD3-P7LV] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).29. Equifax. EquifaxData Breach Settlement. FTC. https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/equifax-data-breach-settlement[https://perma.cc/38BK-RS33] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).30. Shaban H. Binance says hackers stole $40 million worth of bitcoin in onetransaction. Washington Post, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/05/08/binance-says-hackers-stole-million-worth-bitcoin-one-transaction/ [https://perma.cc/3DGK-MEDM] (6 January2021, date last accessed).31. Appel A, Stark PB. Evidence-based elections: create a meaningful papertrail, then audit.Geo L Technol Rev2020;4:523–41.32. Stark PB, Wagner D. Evidence-based elections.IEEE Secur Priv2012;10:33–41.33.Burson v. freeman. 504 U.S. 191 (U.S. Supreme Court), 1992.34. Hays Lowenstein D, Hasen RL, Tokaji DPet al. Election Law: Casesand Materials. 6th ed. See Page 458 Note (a) for Quoted Text. CarolinaAcademic Press, 2017.35. Rivest RL. On the notion of ‘software independence’ in voting systems.Philos Trans R Soc Lond A2008;366:3759–67.36. Rivest RL, Virza M. Software independence revisited. In: Hao, F, Ryan,PYA (eds).Real-World Electronic Voting: Design, Analysis andDeployment. Taylor & Francis. Chap. 1.37. Appel AW, DeMillo RA, Stark PB.Ballot-Marking Devices (Bmds)Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters, 2019.38. New Voting Experience. Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk. https://www.lavote.net/home/voting-elections/voting-options/voting-accessibility/new-voting-experience[https://perma.cc/S328-STFA] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).39.H.R. 2722 — SAFE Act (Securing America’s Federal Elections Act).Congress.gov. Introduced by Rep. Zoe Lofgren on May 5, 2019. Passedthe House on June 27, 2019. Received in the Senate on 28 June 2019.https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2722[https://perma.cc/NA6K-FMVX].40. S. 1540 — Election Security Act of 2019. Congress.gov. Introduced bySen. Amy Klobuchar on 16 May 2019.41.Wyden and Bicameral Coalition Introduce Bill to Require States toSecure Elections. Ron Wyden’s Official Website, 2019. https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-and-bicameral-coalition-introduce-bill-to-require-states-to-secure-elections-[https://perma.cc/5HCA-Q3AN].42. S.W.L. What do election observers do?.The Economist.https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/06/21/what-do-election-observers-do[https://perma.cc/XHV5-SWHG] (6 January 2021, datelast accessed).43. City and Department of Elections County of San Francisco.Observe theElection Process. https://sfelections.sfgov.org/observe-election-process[https://perma.cc/3X5L-ETRW] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).44. European Commission. EuElection Missions. http://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/relations-non-eu-countries/types-relations-and-partnerships/election-observation/mission-recommendations-repository/home[https://perma.cc/KKL4-EU6N] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).45. Sparks S, Butler J. Shadow Walker: raising the bar for windows rootkitdetection.Phrack Magazine0x0b.0x3d, 2005. http://phrack.org/issues/63/8.html [https://perma.cc/52GP-JMAJ] (6 January 2021, date lastaccessed).46. Falliere N, Murchu LO, Chien E. W32. stuxnet dossier.White Paper,Symantec Corp., Security Response2011;5:29.47. Greenberg A. Shopping for zero-days: a price list for hackers’ secret soft-ware exploits. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/03/23/shopping-for-zero-days-an-price-list-for-hackers-secret-software-exploits/ [https://perma.cc/VF2V-ZSVF]. (23 May 2019, date lastaccessed).48. Sultan Niv M.Election 2016: Trump’s Free Media Helped Keep CostDown. April 2017. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/04/election-2016-trump-fewer-donors-provided-more-of-the-cash/[https://perma.cc/6KW5-PPK3](23 May 2019, date last accessed).49. Mueller RS III.Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference inthe 2016 Presidential Election (“The Mueller Report”)”. U.S.Department of Justice, 2019.50. Anderson RJ. Why cryptosystems fail.Commun ACM1994;37:32–40.51. Adrian D, Bhargavan K, Durumeric Zet al.Imperfect forward secrecy:how Diffie-Hellman fails in practice. In:Proceedings of the 22nd ACMSIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM,2015, 5–17.52. Brumley D, Boneh D. Remote timing attacks are practical.ComputNetw2005;48:701–16.53. Feldman AJ, Halderman JA, Felten EW. (2007). Security analysis of thediebold accuvote-ts voting machine. In:2007 USENIX/ACCURATEElectronic Voting Technology Workshop, EVT’07, Boston, MA, USA, 6August2007. Martinez, R Wagner, DA (eds.), USENIX Association,2007.https://www.usenix.org/conference/evt-07/security-analysis-diebold-accuvote-ts-voting-machine (6 January 2021, date last accessed).54. Springall D, Finkenauer T, Durumeric Zet al.Security analysis of theEstonian internet voting system. In:Proceedings of the 2014 ACMSIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ACM,703–715.Journal of Cybersecurity, 2021, Vol. 00, No. 013Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/7/1/tyaa025/6137886 by Robert Gibbons on 05 October 202155. Wolchok S, Wustrow E, Isabel Det al.Attacking the Washington, DCInternet voting system. In:International Conference on FinancialCryptography and Data Security, Springer, 2012, 114–28.56. Lewis SJ, Pereira O, Teague V.How Not to Prove Your ElectionOutcome. Technical Report, March 2019.57. Zetter K.Was Georgia’s Election System Hacked in 2016?https://politi.co/2moAWUS [https://perma.cc/X69Q-DKQP] (23 May2019, date lastaccessed).58. Federal Voting Assistance Program. The uniformed and overseas citizensabsentee voting act overview. https://www.fvap.gov/info/laws/uocava[https://perma.cc/A3SK-R2DX] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).59. Adida B. Advances in cryptographic voting systems. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT,2006.60. Adida B. Helios: web-based open-audit voting. In:Proceedings of the17th USENIX Security Symposium, July 28-August 1, 2008, San Jose,CA, USA. van Oorschot PC (ed.), USENIX Association, 2008,335–348. ISBN: 978-1-931971-60-7. http://www.usenix.org/events/sec08/tech/full_papers/adida/adida.pdf(6 January 2021, date lastaccessed).61. Benaloh J, Rivest RL, Ryan PYAet al.End-to-end verifiability. 15 April 2015.62. Chaum D. Secret-ballot receipts: true voter-verifiable elections.IEEESecur Priv2004;2:38–47.63. Overseas Vote Foundation.The future of voting: End-to-end verifiableinternet voting — specification and feasibility study. (One of the authors,Rivest, was on the Advisory Council for this report.), July 2015.64. Juels A, Catalano D, Jakobsson M. Coercion-resistant electronic elec-tions. In:Proceeding 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the ElectronicSociety, ACM,2005, 61–70.65. Clarkson M, Chong S, Myers A. Civitas: toward a secure voting system. In:Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and PrivacyMay 2008, 354–68.66. Iovino V, Rial A, Rønne PBet al.Using selene to verify your vote in JCJ.In: Brenner M, Rohloff K, Bonneau Jet al.(eds.),FinancialCryptography and Data Security. Springer International Publishing,2017, 385–403. ISBN: 978-3-319-70278-0.67. Wallach D.On Open Source vs. Disclosed Source Voting Systems, 2009.https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2009/04/16/open-source-vs-disclosed-source-voting-systems/ [https://perma.cc/6LDL-3KXG] (6 January 2021,date last accessed).68. Kerckhoffs A. La cryptographie militaire.J Des Sci Milit1883;IX:5–83.69. Fink RA, Sherman AT, Carback R. Tpm meets dre: reducing the trustbase for electronic voting using trusted platform modules.Trans Info ForSec2009;4:628–637.70. Follow My Vote. https://followmyvote.com [https://perma.cc/B83K-U3MU] (6 January 2021, date last accessed).71. Voatz. https://voatz.com [https://perma.cc/J8QA-CCN6] (6 January2021, date last accessed).72. Votem. https://www.votem.com [https://perma.cc/E59M-BWBG] (6January 2021, date last accessed).73. Narayanan A, Clark J. Bitcoin’s academic pedigree.Commun ACM2017;60:36–45.74. Nakamoto Set al. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008.75. Back A,et al. Hashcash-a Denial of Service Counter-Measure, 2002.76. Dwork C, Naor M. Pricing via processing or combatting junk mail. In:Annual International Cryptology Conference, Springer, 1992, 139–47.77. Goldwasse
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages