There is a lot of new info on the site: user experiences; demo/event schedule ("Try eSight" link) FAQ; comparison charts re other low-vision solutions; media reports; funding requests. There
is also a nice 2-1/2 minute operational overview on the website, which has been
distributed
broadly. It is audio and video, but some of my remarks below can be
considered poor man's advance
closed captioning for some of the visual detail, which may help actual
potential users in the audience and provides a lot more detail in
general, assembled from my experience with, research on, and observations and review of the device.
I immediately discovered that eSight Eyewear screens people who express interest in eSight, up front, both to make sure that they can benefit from and can
afford the device -- it is
quite expensive: $12,950, when it was introduced last year. It seems to have gone up to
$15,000 now. But it is nice to note that eSight Eyewear is now actively seeking donations and generating funding options, so that the eSight can be provided to people that could not afford them on their own.
The
preliminary screenings can be done by phone or on the website. Once
they see that you are a serious candidate, they will make an
appointment, at which
they will give you more details, then a series of examinations and
demonstrations, to see if eSight is an appropriate fit. They seem to have offices only in Ottawa and Toronto, but have demos and events all across the country, including Dallas and Houston -- all by appointment only and all of which fill up quickly. I gather that serious candidates can arrange convenient sites, even home or business. You can go through the website, or use the contact point I was given:
Kelly Fantin
Business Devt and Field Sales Mgr
eSight: Bringing Vision To Life
535 Legget Drive, Suite 200
Ottawa Ontario K2K 3B8
Canada
Work: 613-271-9535, ext 222
esighteyewear.com
It was available in Austin when I first discovered the technology.
I spotted this device in an ad about this time last year and
synergistically discovered that there was a hands-on demo in Austin
within the next 3 weeks, announcing the product launch at an open house Dr. Laura Miller's Low Vision Service.
It is no longer available there, because of a change in the sales/service model. More on that and Dr. Miller in a subsequent post.
As
an assistive technology specialist, I was able to finagle an invitation to that demo day. I was also allowed to invite direct consumers, which I did in my successful post here.
I will try to provide some
insight I got at the demo, and subsequent research, to help you decide how and whether to follow up.
At least 15 people, including me,
signed up for eSight demos. The demos were supposed to be 30-60
minutes. Although they had 5-6 people, including an eSight Eyeware company rep, trained to demo it,
they only had 2 devices. Since the Open House ran for about 4 hours, I
did not think it would be fair or reasonable for me to deprive a
potential user of a full demo slot (although I was actually the second to sign up).
So
I got into some AT discussions, related to low vision, with some true
candidate clients , and got one to let me piggyback with him (and his son). He did get some
benefit
from my observations, as well as I did from his. But that meant I did
not get a
true hands-on demo. On the other hand, not having macular
degeneration or official low vision (my near-sightedness and contacts
don't count), it was informative to see someone with such vision
impairment trying to use the devices. Still, I felt like I should not
interfere with his demo, though I had lots of questions, comments and
suggestions. I screened my input, choosing what I thought might be
reasonable and helpful, and not distracting of time consuming, to a demo/sales process.
From
the pictures and description, you will quickly agree that "goggles" is a more
appropriate term than "glasses", because they stick out, wrap around and actually appears fairly cumbersome.
The device looks
very well made. Though large and
awkward looking, they are also very light and seemed well balanced.
Still, they have a strap to hold them in place. Hey, at 15 grand, I'd
want some security! The digital hardware portion of the goggles
can be rotated upward to provide normal vision, via a pair of
integrated prescription glasses. Note that this means eSight is
augmenting a user's corrected vision. The system may already be a little
smaller than the one I saw last year. I expect it to shrink much more. The
company says you can wear them anywhere, like glasses, but you will
feel like you're wearing goggles and it will be conspicuous. But
function surely wins over form in this arena. As I will discuss below, the
battery life is not conducive to continuous use, possibly not even full-workday
use.
The
piggy on whose back I riding, i.e., the true candidate for this technology, found it a
bit hard to get used to. He appeared to do
pretty well in terms of keeping his head steady, but had some trouble
"aiming" at what he wanted to see. Aiming should be akin to looking, but
this user's vision was sufficiently degraded that he really didn't know
where to look. But he said he was impressed when he got aimed
correctly. Part of his problem was that the certified trainer was
directing him
where to look, as opposed to him just looking where he wanted. I
suggested afterwards that they have a broader spectrum of visual
objects, so there
was something sight-worthy most everywhere he looked. [I made a couple
of
other suggestions to improve the demo, which were well-received.]
Another
problem was that, although the device includes a built-in set of lenses
at the user's prescription, during the demo, the user did not have his
usual correction, so was "flying blind", in a fairly literal sense.
Moreover, I determined that, during a full evaluation,
the trainer can perform the usual A-B optical choices within
the device, so that the customer will have his latest prescription in
it, prior
to purchase. I figured that this was surely the case, but it was
comforting to have it confirmed.
The lightness of the glasses is
offset by the heaviness of its remote controller, which the user must
carry around, as it was (and apparently still is) wired to the
glasses. It houses the main computer, several manual controls and a battery. It is also fairly
large. It might fit into a suit coat pocket, though just barely.
The battery lasts
only about 4 hours, and charges
overnight, but it comes with two removable batteries -- There goes your other
pocket; at least the weight will be balanced! I recall it comes with a carry
bag and strap. Still, as I previously indicated, you can't rely on it for
all-day use, even if you wanted to. It could be awful to have the batteries die while you
are relying on them. I really think that, despite the ads, the system is intended for usage in
specific activities, in discrete intervals, not for continuous use. Battery life may
not be a problem in such usage: Turning off the image processing should increase the time between charges.
Note the large size of the remote may enable a better physical control interface, discussed in detail
below,
for people with low vision. So there could be a size/usabilty tradeoff.
But it all does feel a little awkward, and lighter could help.
Surely,
these devices will get smaller, lighter, less conspicuous
and wireless, eventually supported by a cloud server, with the portable
server as back-up. The battery life should also increase and the price
is bound to drop dramatically. The size of the controller is probably
related to the battery, but that tachnology is improving. Moreover, if
the processing moved to a remote server,the battery size/capacity could
decrease and its in-use life increase.
The
remote has only a small number of mechanical controls and associated functions, which allow users
to improve or accommodate vision for many situations. -- zoom,
contrast, brightness, and color. The simplicity is useful for operation
with low or no vision, and also makes the controls easy to learn. This remote
has 2 dials and 5 raised buttons arranged as in a directional keypad or game pad.
A
user can freeze the frame, which allows for stable viewing, e.g., for reading
or enjoying a view. Zoom is controlled by a dial (specifically, a large
rotating knob) and ranges from 1.5X to 14X zoom, which is a pretty wide
range of focus, covering many sorts of activities -- reading, TV,
sporting events etc. The online and
video demos show continuous zoom, but the live demo showed only discrete
increments. The trainer said she was not sure, but she had mention 6 levels of zoom
in her presentation. This rotary zoom control has discrete stops, with detent-like haptic or motor
feedback.
Contrast
is also controlled by a dial, a smaller knob. It has a dual function:
rotating adjusts contrast continuously, while pressing down on the knob
steps the images through six discrete custom color combinations. These
functions allow the user to adjust
their view to better distinguish objects and words.
Finally, there is that 5-button control, whose functions control brightness up and down, and focus, and allow
the user freeze the frame or rest the device to defaults (which I think
users can customize).
The
certified trainers only vaguely conveyed how the technology was
really working. But I asked a few questions and searched around for
better details of the basic technology. One of the best sources was
which corroborates and augments my research.
The goggles capture HD video at the user’s eye level and send the
images to the image processor in the controller. The video is optimizes in the context
of the user’s settings and specified information about his or her visual condition. This optimized video is
sent back to the goggles and displays images on its LED screens, which the
user then sees through their built-in prescription lenses. This happens in real time. An interesting aspect is that the system leverages
the user's peripheral vision, which is not affected by macular
degenerations: by stimulating
the functioning of those photo receptors, neurons, or cones, and combining
everything to create an image in the brain which can defy the user’s eye
conditions.
Here
are some
questions that popped into my mind, but I did not feel I should ask in
my mode as an interested, non-distracting observer. The experts/trainers
were too busy to ask
post-demo, and I never followed through.
What is included in the initial setup?
How much of the
price is setup and training?
What
would be the replacement price for the individual components?
How does
it adapt to vision changes?
Are there integration issues for the individual displays for
each eye?
Is there any money back guarantee, if short term success
does not portend long term success. [I recall reading that there is a 30-day policy.]
Will there be a migration path to
improvements?