Huh, that's a tough one. Looks liiiiike this was about the time I
changed "tarball" to "package", and there are *supposed* to be
compatibility layers in there to handle it. package-url takes an option
name, but it doesn't communicate that to the validate-tarball function
that's supposed to do some additional validation. I thiiiink that code
might be superfluous--we can replace it by adding :missing "msg" to the
package-url option spec, but thaaaat's gonna be a bit more of a change
than I want to make over breakfast right now, because we're also gonna
have to pull the cockroach tests up to using the latest Jepsen release.
--Kyle