Unless someone made substantial progress they want to talk about, I suggest we cancel today's meeting. That will also give me time to set up an alternate teleconference arrangement and recover from the WG21 meeting.
By default, I will try to set up something based on Google Hangouts, though I don't yet have experience doing that with similar constraints. If you have a preference please let me know.
Since we've had issues getting critical mass for the last few meetings, I'd like to reduce the meeting schedule to once every four weeks by default, and see how that goes. If there is something urgent to discuss, we can revisit. So let's aim for a meeting on the 26th (Monday after Thanksgiving) in this time slot, and then probably every four weeks after that.
Possibly relevant news from the WG21 meeting for those who weren't there (others may want to add):
- The core part of the executors proposal is still/again possibly on track for C++20.
- Memory model fixes loosely based on the Lahav et al paper (Weaken seq_cst/acq/rel interaction, fix seq consistent fences, remove same-thread writes from release sequence) made it in. (P0668 & PP0982)
- People liked the asymmetric fences proposal (P1202), though many of us had hoped this could be done with less violence to the memory model.
Hans