enum dangling reference

Hyman Rosen

unread,

Mar 6, 2019, 5:48:07 PM3/6/19

to std-dis...@isocpp.org

[conv.prom] speaks about "values in the range bmin to bmax as described in 9.6"
but section 9.6 no longer contains this description. This one line is now the only
place in the Standard that mentions these two values.

Richard Smith

unread,

Mar 6, 2019, 7:12:09 PM3/6/19

to std-dis...@isocpp.org, Hyman Rosen

Yes, that's a problem. Would you like to file an editorial issue
(https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues)? I can file it if you
prefer.

Hyman Rosen

unread,

Mar 6, 2019, 10:38:49 PM3/6/19

to std-dis...@isocpp.org

Yes, please.

Richard Smith

unread,

Mar 7, 2019, 3:35:48 PM3/7/19

to std-dis...@isocpp.org

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/2751

Thanks for reporting this!

> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Discussion" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-discussio...@isocpp.org.
> To post to this group, send email to std-dis...@isocpp.org.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-discussion/.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward