ISO C++ Standard - Discussion

Contact owners and managers

1–30 of 1940

This list has moved. You can subscribe to the new Std-Discussion list here: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion

0 selected

Kazutoshi Satoda2

12/7/20

Pointer-interconvertibility between a standard-layout non-empty class object and its empty base class subobject

Sorry I sent the message to wrong list. Now re-sent to https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2020/

unread,

Pointer-interconvertibility between a standard-layout non-empty class object and its empty base class subobject

Sorry I sent the message to wrong list. Now re-sent to https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2020/

12/7/20

Vlad from Moscow, … Matthew Woehlke5

7/8/19

Minor changes of the description of comparison operators of std::reverse_iterator

On 03/07/2019 13.40, 'Vlad from Moscow' wrote: > By the way could you provide a reference

unread,

Minor changes of the description of comparison operators of std::reverse_iterator

On 03/07/2019 13.40, 'Vlad from Moscow' wrote: > By the way could you provide a reference

7/8/19

Vlad from Moscow2

6/28/19

Why is std::partition specialized for random access iterators?

Oh, I made a typo in this loop for ( const auto &item : lst1 ) std::cout << item <<

unread,

Why is std::partition specialized for random access iterators?

Oh, I made a typo in this loop for ( const auto &item : lst1 ) std::cout << item <<

6/28/19

Vlad from Moscow, Jens Maurer6

6/28/19

Minor edition in 17 Templates

However this just confuses readers. There are three categories of template declarations. standalone

unread,

Minor edition in 17 Templates

However this just confuses readers. There are three categories of template declarations. standalone

6/28/19

Thiago Macieira

4/26/19

Re: [std-discussion] subscripting fold expression

On Thursday, 25 April 2019 23:47:12 PDT Christof Meerwald wrote: > And while we are on the topic.

unread,

Re: [std-discussion] subscripting fold expression

On Thursday, 25 April 2019 23:47:12 PDT Christof Meerwald wrote: > And while we are on the topic.

4/26/19

Thiago Macieira

4/24/19

Re: [std-discussion] Templatized virtual functions

On Wednesday, 24 April 2019 09:16:50 PDT Ritwik Das via Std-Discussion wrote: > So why would

unread,

Re: [std-discussion] Templatized virtual functions

On Wednesday, 24 April 2019 09:16:50 PDT Ritwik Das via Std-Discussion wrote: > So why would

4/24/19

4/15/19

This list is moving to: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/

As previously announced, due to service problems with Google Groups we are moving this list to

unread,locked,

This list is moving to: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/

As previously announced, due to service problems with Google Groups we are moving this list to

4/15/19

4/10/19

Re: [std-discussion] unordered_map iterator validity and performance

I don't think your analysis is correct. When there is a lookup miss (ie .find returns .end) each

unread,

Re: [std-discussion] unordered_map iterator validity and performance

I don't think your analysis is correct. When there is a lookup miss (ie .find returns .end) each

4/10/19

Matthew Woehlke, … Brian Bi7

4/9/19

Constexpr members and narrowing

On 09/04/2019 11.56, Brian Bi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:51 AM Matthew Woehlke wrote: >

unread,

Constexpr members and narrowing

On 09/04/2019 11.56, Brian Bi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:51 AM Matthew Woehlke wrote: >

4/9/19

Tadeus Prastowo

4/8/19

Re: [std-discussion] Pointers into mutlidimensional arrays

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:45 PM <ndkr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Consider the following

unread,

Re: [std-discussion] Pointers into mutlidimensional arrays

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:45 PM <ndkr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Consider the following

4/8/19

ndkr...@gmail.com2

4/8/19

Pointers into multidimensional arrays

If the conclusion of this thread [https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msg/std-discussion/

unread,

Pointers into multidimensional arrays

If the conclusion of this thread [https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msg/std-discussion/

4/8/19

farid....@gmail.com, … Hyman Rosen8

4/7/19

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:21 PM Peter Sommerlad <peter.s...@hsr.ch> wrote: In my book,

unread,

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:21 PM Peter Sommerlad <peter.s...@hsr.ch> wrote: In my book,

4/7/19

Nathan Oliver, … Nicolas Lesser5

3/30/19

std::to_address allows temporary "fancy pointers" which will return a dangling pointer

inkwizytoryankes@ wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 4:25:25 PM UTC+1, Nicolas

unread,

std::to_address allows temporary "fancy pointers" which will return a dangling pointer

inkwizytoryankes@ wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 4:25:25 PM UTC+1, Nicolas

3/30/19

3/29/19

idea regarding std::allocator<>

The containers like std::vector<> that rely on std::allocator usually allocate a new block when

unread,

idea regarding std::allocator<>

The containers like std::vector<> that rely on std::allocator usually allocate a new block when

3/29/19

razvyb...@gmail.com, … Alberto Barbati5

3/27/19

Friend function definition standard wording

Ok, so you think that the standard is correct (the condition "the function has namespace scope

unread,

Friend function definition standard wording

Ok, so you think that the standard is correct (the condition "the function has namespace scope

3/27/19

Cassio Neri, … Matthew Woehlke9

3/26/19

std::min, Cpp17LessThanComparable, doubles and NaN again.

On 25/03/2019 16.46, Hyman Rosen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:10 PM Cassio Neri <cassio.

unread,

std::min, Cpp17LessThanComparable, doubles and NaN again.

On 25/03/2019 16.46, Hyman Rosen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:10 PM Cassio Neri <cassio.

3/26/19

Ayrosa, Brian Bi3

3/26/19

Are [basic.lookup.elab]/2 and [basic.scope.pdecl](7.2) in contradiction

I took me sometime to really grasp what you wrote below. Thanks for the excellent answer. On Monday,

unread,

Are [basic.lookup.elab]/2 and [basic.scope.pdecl](7.2) in contradiction

I took me sometime to really grasp what you wrote below. Thanks for the excellent answer. On Monday,

3/26/19

Medosz, … Tony V E5

3/25/19

There's a discord server - include_cpp See https://www.includecpp.org/ Sent from my BlackBerry

unread,

There's a discord server - include_cpp See https://www.includecpp.org/ Sent from my BlackBerry

3/25/19

ajiten, peter...@gmail.com2

3/24/19

srand48() : Unable to compile due to scope issues on Windows in Dev-C++.

srand48 is not a standard C++ function. Den söndag 24 mars 2019 kl. 05:43:39 UTC+1 skrev ajiten: Dev-

unread,

srand48() : Unable to compile due to scope issues on Windows in Dev-C++.

srand48 is not a standard C++ function. Den söndag 24 mars 2019 kl. 05:43:39 UTC+1 skrev ajiten: Dev-

3/24/19

Matthew Woehlke, … sdo...@gmail.com12

3/20/19

Preprocessor and fun with string literals

The important part, at least for not getting broken results, is doing the encoding from internal

unread,

Preprocessor and fun with string literals

The important part, at least for not getting broken results, is doing the encoding from internal

3/20/19

picpps...@gmail.com, … Balog Pal9

3/19/19

Why is lambda's capture a unicorn?

On 3/19/2019 3:11 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 15:52, Balog Pal <pasa@

unread,

Why is lambda's capture a unicorn?

On 3/19/2019 3:11 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 15:52, Balog Pal <pasa@

3/19/19

pirie....@gmail.com

3/18/19

Template File Management and Implementation

So, I just am asking for clarification and wonder on why but, while creating a template class; why

unread,

Template File Management and Implementation

So, I just am asking for clarification and wonder on why but, while creating a template class; why

3/18/19

abhishek gupta, … Bo Persson4

3/16/19

Rules of operator overloading in C++

On 2019-03-16 at 12:24, abhishek gupta wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please resolve my doubts

unread,

Rules of operator overloading in C++

On 2019-03-16 at 12:24, abhishek gupta wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please resolve my doubts

3/16/19

Myriachan, Richard Smith2

3/12/19

Changing rules for casting pointers/references to arrays

On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 14:15, Myriachan <myri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Right now,

unread,

Changing rules for casting pointers/references to arrays

On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 14:15, Myriachan <myri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Right now,

3/12/19

Language Lawyer

3/12/19

Why member name lookup is defined in terms of subobjects?

[class.member.lookup]/3 defines the lookup set as follows: > The lookup set for f in C, called S(f

unread,

Why member name lookup is defined in terms of subobjects?

[class.member.lookup]/3 defines the lookup set as follows: > The lookup set for f in C, called S(f

3/12/19

abhishek gupta, … Thiago Macieira5

3/12/19

unordered_set in C++

On Monday, 11 March 2019 20:46:17 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > And as others have found out, that

unread,

unordered_set in C++

On Monday, 11 March 2019 20:46:17 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > And as others have found out, that

3/12/19

Robin Le Bihan, Language Lawyer3

3/9/19

Template and inheritance member-function lookup

Le dimanche 10 mars 2019 02:11:06 UTC+1, Language Lawyer a écrit : Ask your favorite search engine

unread,

Template and inheritance member-function lookup

Le dimanche 10 mars 2019 02:11:06 UTC+1, Language Lawyer a écrit : Ask your favorite search engine

3/9/19

Hyman Rosen, Richard Smith4

3/7/19

enum dangling reference

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/2751 Thanks for reporting this! On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 19:38

unread,

enum dangling reference

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/2751 Thanks for reporting this! On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 19:38

3/7/19

Belloc, … Chris Hallock4

3/6/19

What is the purpose of a default member initializer to be considered a complete-class context?

On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-3, Christof Meerwald wrote: You mainly need the

unread,

What is the purpose of a default member initializer to be considered a complete-class context?

On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-3, Christof Meerwald wrote: You mainly need the

3/6/19

Tadeus Prastowo

3/5/19

template<class T, T v> cannot specialize to template<bool &v> struct<bool &, v> in C++17?

Hi, Could someone confirm whether in C++17 "template<class T, T v> struct X" can or

unread,

template<class T, T v> cannot specialize to template<bool &v> struct<bool &, v> in C++17?

Hi, Could someone confirm whether in C++17 "template<class T, T v> struct X" can or

3/5/19

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu