Is void{} legal?

[michel...@gmail.com]

I'll refer to the following question on SO:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39354065/is-void-legal-or-not

It pointed out that the working draft mentions void{} in dcl.type.auto.deduct.
It appears to be an issue, for void{} is not a legal expression.
It should probably changed to void and that's all.

Am I right? Otherwise, what's wrong in my reasoning?

Thank you.

[Richard Smith]

Yes, this is a wording bug; I've fixed it to say 'void()' instead:

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/edadb9b1ebece68c75602bc8e61db6e34f41f0a1

Thanks for reporting this!

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-discussion+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-dis...@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-discussion/.