How to know whether a proposal was adopted or rejected.?

[Vlad from Moscow]

I saw post-Portland mailing list  and the most positions in it have no the date of atoption. Does it mean that that proposals were rejected or they are still considered in the Committee? 

[Daniel Krügler]

2013/1/10 Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru>:

> I saw post-Portland mailing list and the most positions in it have no the
> date of atoption. Does it mean that that proposals were rejected or they are
> still considered in the Committee?

I *think* that the current list is just not up-to-date because of the
lack of time.

Can you give an example? Maybe I can check that for you.

- Daniel

[Vlad from Moscow]

пятница, 11 января 2013 г., 1:51:38 UTC+4 пользователь Daniel Krügler написал:

Daniel, I am interested in my proposal about std::iota.  Because I am goint to continue my creative work in the field of standard algorithms.:)

[Daniel Krügler]

2013/1/10 Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru>:
>
> пятница, 11 января 2013 г., 1:51:38 UTC+4 пользователь Daniel Krügler
> написал:
>>
>> 2013/1/10 Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru>:
>> > I saw post-Portland mailing list and the most positions in it have no
>> > the
>> > date of atoption. Does it mean that that proposals were rejected or they
>> > are
>> > still considered in the Committee?
>>
>> I *think* that the current list is just not up-to-date because of the
>> lack of time.
>>
>> Can you give an example? Maybe I can check that for you.
>>
>> - Daniel
>
> Daniel, I am interested in my proposal about std::iota.

According to my information N3457 had not been discussed yet at the
Portland meeting.

> Because I am goint
> to continue my creative work in the field of standard algorithms.:)

This work is very much appreciated!

Thanks,

- Daniel

[Vlad from Moscow]

пятница, 11 января 2013 г., 2:08:34 UTC+4 пользователь Daniel Krügler написал:

Well, then I will continue. The next victim from <numeric> will be std::accumulate. 

[Beman Dawes]

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Krügler
<daniel....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/1/10 Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru>:
>> I saw post-Portland mailing list and the most positions in it have no the
>> date of atoption. Does it mean that that proposals were rejected or they are
>> still considered in the Committee?
>
> I *think* that the current list is just not up-to-date because of the
> lack of time.

Library proposal tracking has landed in my lap AFAIK, but it will be a
week or two before I can get an update together. I'll put it up on
GitHub so it is always available.

--Beman

[Vlad from Moscow]

пятница, 11 января 2013 г., 5:23:21 UTC+4 пользователь Beman Dawes написал:

What is GitHub and where can it be seen?

[Olaf van der Spek]

Op zaterdag 12 januari 2013 14:54:10 UTC+1 schreef Vlad from Moscow het volgende:

What is GitHub and where can it be seen?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=github 

[Vlad from Moscow]

суббота, 12 января 2013 г., 19:40:06 UTC+3 пользователь Olaf van der Spek написал:

Op zaterdag 12 januari 2013 14:54:10 UTC+1 schreef Vlad from Moscow het volgende:

What is GitHub and where can it be seen?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=github 

Could you say more precisely where to seek the relevant reference in github?

[Olaf van der Spek]

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft 

[Vlad from Moscow]

понедельник, 28 января 2013 г., 18:33:42 UTC+3 пользователь Olaf van der Spek написал:

I am sorry but I did not find where there is said about what proposals of Portland mailing were accepted or rejected. And I do not understand why this information is inaccessible in the official cite of the C++ Standard Committee. I think that this information shall be accessible for everyone who even do not knopw about this forum.

[Ville Voutilainen]

On 29 January 2013 15:09, Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru> wrote:
> I am sorry but I did not find where there is said about what proposals of
> Portland mailing were accepted or rejected. And I do not understand why this
> information is inaccessible in the official cite of the C++ Standard
> Committee. I think that this information shall be accessible for everyone
> who even do not knopw about this forum.

Perhaps http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n3488.html
and http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n3486.html
help you with that.

[Vlad from Moscow]

вторник, 29 января 2013 г., 16:19:47 UTC+3 пользователь Ville Voutilainen написал:

Thanks, it is an useful information. But does it mean that other proposals were rejected?

[Ville Voutilainen]

On 29 January 2013 15:33, Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru> wrote:
>> Perhaps http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n3488.html
>> and http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n3486.html
>> help you with that.
> Thanks, it is an useful information. But does it mean that other proposals
> were rejected?

The evolution paper status says which ones were rejected, if any. The
editor's report
tells what was added. The individual issue statuses show what happened to them,
the closed issues list reveals rejected issues. The information isn't
all in one place,
but it's not hidden. If you wish to ask about the status of something
specific, feel
free to do so.

[Vlad from Moscow]

вторник, 29 января 2013 г., 16:40:38 UTC+3 пользователь Ville Voutilainen написал:

All what I am interested at present is of course my proposal on std::iota modifications.

[Ville Voutilainen]

On 30 January 2013 14:37, Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru> wrote:
> All what I am interested at present is of course my proposal on std::iota
> modifications.

The paper on that appeared in the post-meeting mailing for Portland,
and there hasn't
been any meetings since, so it hasn't been looked at yet.

[Jean-Marc Bourguet]

On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:37:08 -0800 (PST), Vlad from Moscow
<vlad....@mail.ru> wrote:
> All what I am interested at present is of course my proposal on
> std::iota modifications.

N3457? That version is in a mailing done since the last meeting, so
hasn't been looked at,
and I don't see a previous version.

See N3397 for informations about next meeting.

Yours,


--
Jean-Marc