This Message Is From an External SenderThis message came from outside your organization.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/12a4954f-4247-4a3a-b534-c461e0c24d25n%40humanconnectome.org.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/topic/hcp-users/DuKrhP96eso/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CAOxRjYkghpJyNJEa1uDZYwtXwng8hXdtbS0QWexbZVH-FA-hWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
There may be a conflict between doing things well and doing them easily. If you rely solely on GUI-based tools in Neuroimaging, you will end up way behind the technology curve. You can use wb_command -cifti-parcellate to get the .dtseries.nii file parcellated and then wb_command -cifti-correlation to make a Connectome (e.g., using the HCP’s multi-modal parcellation: https://balsa.wustl.edu/file/87B9N). You can then use the PALM software to do statistical analyses of the resulting Connectomes.
Matt.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CAN07bRRbgVedNj7jzYcLWEgH9kfrhEEUBPy7vo7WRSFtsF%3Dugw%40mail.gmail.com.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/EC6F6E9B-5927-4110-A44E-E922D0D75AC1%40wustl.edu.
wb_command -cifti-separate data.dscalar.nii COLUMN -volume-all data_sub.nii -metric CORTEX_LEFT data_L.func.gii -metric CORTEX_RIGHT data_R.func.giiTo view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/EC6F6E9B-5927-4110-A44E-E922D0D75AC1%40wustl.edu.
I would also be interested in Anderson’s advice as we also plan to do some analyses of pconn files (parcels x parcels connectivity matrices) in PALM. Anderson, how do we do this?
Thanks,
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CAN07bRSs39%3DQcCFh-0b0bCV4AfNKcDfZKNCoygZZ%3D6PuSGqJKA%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/2C338AC3-C105-4E0D-B37E-3C1F8C0FF852%40wustl.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CAN07bRTw%3DLZ2WoowFwy1%2Bo55QpG4SesoaR3agUkNsFPEvpV5gw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CANm3QU5mhEagNRzTmHh4QhD0zuD8EiGeppNyf-49FhgeA8R5vA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Shruti,
That approach is indeed valid as long as the N*(N-1)/2 measures (edges) are not what is being permuted.
Currently PALM will not read .pconn.nii files. So, the workaround is to unwrap the matrices and reassemble as a .csv file, one column per edge of the connectivity matrix, and one row per subject. Then feed this table into PALM as input. Once the results are ready, wrap back to the original network matrix format.
I was talking to Matt yesterday and it seems the modifications to accommodate .pconn.nii are relatively minor so I hope we can have the ability of operating on those files soon. Meanwhile, the above workaround should work.
All the best,
Anderson
From:
Shruti Kinger <shr...@iiitd.ac.in>
Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 12:34 AM
To: hcp-...@humanconnectome.org <hcp-...@humanconnectome.org>
Cc: Anderson Winkler <anderson...@utrgv.edu>, Guo, Grace <gra...@wustl.edu>
Subject: Re: [hcp-users] Getting started with rsfMRI analysis
External Mail
This email originated outside of The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
Please exercise caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
Hi Shruti,
The correlation matrix here is a 379 by 379, and this is presumably for 1 subject. For investigations that involve multiple subjects, we’d want to have them and permute across them. Permuting among the 379 network nodes isn’t helpful for inference.
Just an update here: We will soon have this functionality in the latest version of PALM ready for use.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/a406c5b6-83c0-4512-ad12-7b2092bbd2d5n%40humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/5F9AA74A-7DE4-4825-AAE9-44C998FA3408%40wustl.edu.
The plan is to be able to merge pconn files across subjects into a pconnscalar file type. Then PALM operates on that as it does any other file type (with a default behavior to consider only a triangle of a symmetric matrix) and outputs a pconn of the stats for each cell of the connectome matrix. You would be able to then use PALM to compare with any non-imaging variables that you wanted. We are doing that locally for our own purposes and working with Anderson to get this functionality implemented.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/CAN07bRTcTatdsQ%2BvXB7xaPqmvyc6d_wkYv6JVD2L0GPgfY6S0w%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/5FF127C2-9A3F-4B4F-A168-6839CB813121%40wustl.edu.
The latest version of PALM can take .pconnscalar.nii files in (which you can produce with the CIFTI matlab toolbox as concatenated .pconn.nii files across subjects along the third dimension) and outputs files in .pconn.nii format.
Matt.
From: Negar Memarian <negar.m...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "hcp-...@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-...@humanconnectome.org>
Date: Sunday, March 24, 2024 at 10:23 PM
To: HCP-Users <hcp-...@humanconnectome.org>
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/c4bf5be4-b6bc-48f1-b496-e36a5dc3370bn%40humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/AF86196D-A1F6-4C4D-BE8B-9CAD59E25DE9%40wustl.edu.
We extracted Fisher z-transformed connectivity values between parcel A and all other parcels (approximately 300) from the first-level analysis from 400 participants from the HCP dataset to examine their association with working-memory scores in FSL PALM, while controlling for nuisance covariates. This provided us with the p-values and t-values for each connection.
We now intend to use a machine-learning model to predict behaviour (e.g., working memory score) from brain connectivity, which requires obtaining the corresponding second-level Fisher z estimates.
Could you please clarify whether PALM provides a way to compute second-level Fisher z values directly? If not, could you share an alternative approach? We require these values to serve as features in our model. [Features (X) = Fisher z values; Outcome (y) = working memory scores]
I would appreciate your guidance on this.
Hi Shruti,
You can, absolutely. If the matrix is symmetric, just the upper or lower triangular part are sufficient.
All the best,
Anderson
From: Shruti Kinger <shr...@iiitd.ac.in>
Date: Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:31 PM
To: Anderson Winkler <anderson...@utrgv.edu>
Subject: Re: [hcp-users] Getting started with rsfMRI analysisExternal Mail
This email originated outside of The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
Please exercise caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
Yes, Sir, I understand that. I just meant if it is a symmetrical matrix then can’t I use just the upper/lower triangular part of the matrix which will give me N*(N-1)/2 =72010 measures (edges) of one participant .
I understand the logic for using the entire N*N matrix (379*379=143641 edges) for an asymmetrical matrix. But I didn’t understand why can’t I use N*(N-1)/2 for a symmetrical matrix.
Thanks a lot for your patience and time for replying to my queries.