Hi,
1. In “Session 2” (with the dMRI) the middle session SEFM pair is to have a back-up available for the rsfMRI scans. In “Session 1”, the middle SEFM pair is what we would typically use for the task-fMRI scans that follow it.
2. Sure, that should be fine, provided that the subject doesn’t move position dramatically. And, as always, you want the shim in place during the SEFM pair to be the same shim that is active during the tfMRI_AP and tfMRI_PA scans.
Cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
From: Estephan Moana <esteph...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "hcp-...@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-...@humanconnectome.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM
To: HCP-Users <hcp-...@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: [hcp-users] HCP aging spin echo fieldmaps midsession
|
* External Email - Caution * |
Hello, I'm developing a imaging protocol based on the HCP aging (Harms 2018) and have a couple of questions.
1. In the article it is stated that "A pair of spin echo images with AP and PA phase encoding...are also acquired at the beginning and middle of each scanning session...". I was under the assumption that field maps should be preferentially acquired immediately before BOLD fMRI scans to best capture head position and consequent magnetic inhomogeneities. In Harms 2018 Table 1 for session 2 shows field maps being collect before rfMRI and again before diffusion data collection. What is the purpose of the middle session field maps?

2. For some of the task fMRI runs planned, it will be needed an interval of ~5min between them. So I am planning to collect the task fMRI of opposed phase encoding separated by other modalities such as T1w. For example: fieldmaps AP & PA, tfMRI_AP, T1w, tfMRI_PA. Do you see any problems not collecting task fMRI AP and PA scans in immediate sequence?
Thank you.
Estephan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/43108750-97c1-48da-a406-fce65673c1dfn%40humanconnectome.org.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
As part of our internal “session building” process we check the shims on the scans. If the shims of the SEFM’s don’t match those of the BOLD to which they are normally matched, but a later SEFM pair in the same session does match, then we associate the later SEFM pair with the BOLD.
Cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
2. For some of the task fMRI runs planned, it will be needed an interval of ~5min between them. So I am planning to collect the task fMRI of opposed phase encoding separated by other modalities such as T1w. For example: fieldmaps AP & PA, tfMRI_AP, T1w, tfMRI_PA. Do you see any problems not collecting task fMRI AP and PA scans in immediate sequence?
Thank you.
Estephan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/43108750-97c1-48da-a406-fce65673c1dfn%40humanconnectome.org.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/68128f97-5ec6-4482-b857-4c7ab6ba85d4n%40humanconnectome.org.
Hi,
In general, yes, both rfMRI runs in a pair will typically use the same SEFM pair. Similarly, the tfMRI will generally use the same pair. BUT, it’s not a requirement of the session building process. If, for whatever reason (stuff happens at the scanner), one tfMRI run had shims that matched with one SEFM pair, and a following tfMRI run had shims that matched with a different SEFM pair in the same session, then different SEFMs would have been assigned to the two different tfMRI scans.
In short, shatever SEFM pair is associated with a given BOLD run in our released “unprocessed” directories is what got used for the processing.
Error! Filename not specified.
2. For some of the task fMRI runs planned, it will be needed an interval of ~5min between them. So I am planning to collect the task fMRI of opposed phase encoding separated by other modalities such as T1w. For example: fieldmaps AP & PA, tfMRI_AP, T1w, tfMRI_PA. Do you see any problems not collecting task fMRI AP and PA scans in immediate sequence?
Thank you.
Estephan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/43108750-97c1-48da-a406-fce65673c1dfn%40humanconnectome.org.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/68128f97-5ec6-4482-b857-4c7ab6ba85d4n%40humanconnectome.org.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HCP-Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
hcp-users+...@humanconnectome.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/humanconnectome.org/d/msgid/hcp-users/6085cad8-f960-4597-9367-ecfd8fce4e9cn%40humanconnectome.org.