a different way to change board size

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Richard Eisenberg

unread,
Mar 13, 2024, 9:13:39 AM3/13/24
to 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
Hi all,

After some negative reaction to my proposed change to eliminate the board size cap, I have tried again, in https://gitlab.haskell.org/hf/meta/-/merge_requests/54 . This allows us to vote in a slate of candidates leading to a size greater than 14, but without just dropping the cap entirely. It's a bit more complex, but I think would be easy enough to use in practice. Happy to discuss at tomorrow's meeting.

Richard

Andres Löh

unread,
Mar 13, 2024, 9:26:19 AM3/13/24
to Richard Eisenberg, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
Hi Richard.

I'm generally much happier with this method than the originally proposed general lifting of the size limit. There's an aspect of the algorithm I'm still uncertain about and I wanted to re-read the other voting rules ... In particular, is your two-thirds majority function intended to just require two-thirds majority among the submitted votes, or among the eligible members of the corresponding subgroup?

Best,
Andres

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haskell Foundation Board" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to board+un...@haskell.foundation.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/haskell.foundation/d/msgid/board/010f018e37f269cb-376f1d17-6e6f-4851-83bf-94bdd4bf7455-000000%40us-east-2.amazonses.com.

Andres Löh

unread,
Mar 19, 2024, 12:59:41 PM3/19/24
to Richard Eisenberg, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
Hi everyone.

I would like to remind you all that as far as I can see, we're currently still short of a 2/3 majority for Richard's second board size change proposal, and the deadline is the 20th, i.e., tomorrow / Wednesday. It's of course possible that there really is no sufficient majority, which is totally fine with me, but I would nearly have forgotten even though I wanted to approve (which I have yesterday), and I thought others might be in a similar situation.

Best,
Andres

Simon Peyton Jones

unread,
Mar 19, 2024, 1:05:42 PM3/19/24
to Andres Löh, Richard Eisenberg, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
I would like to remind you all that as far as I can see, we're currently still short of a 2/3 majority for Richard's second board size change proposal, and the deadline is the 20th, i.e., tomorrow / Wednesday. It's of course possible that there really is no sufficient majority, which is totally fine with me, but I would nearly have forgotten even though I wanted to approve (which I have yesterday), and I thought others might be in a similar situation.

There is a slight process problem here.  We can vote "yes" by clicking "approve".  But there is no way to vote "no" or "abstain".  I would be much more comfortable if there was -- then we'd know for sure whether everyone had made a conscious choice, or whether the invitation to vote had got submerged for some of us.

Can I suggest that all "no" or "abstain" voters reply direct to Andres to say so -- then he knows who has not yet expressed an opinion at all.  (We all should!  It's part of our job as members of the board.)

 Thanks

Simon

Richard Eisenberg

unread,
Mar 19, 2024, 9:52:00 PM3/19/24
to Andres Löh, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board


On Mar 13, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Andres Löh <and...@haskell.foundation> wrote:

 In particular, is your two-thirds majority function intended to just require two-thirds majority among the submitted votes, or among the eligible members of the corresponding subgroup?

It's meant to be the latter. That is, if most of the board misses the vote, then we don't act.

Richard

Richard Eisenberg

unread,
Mar 19, 2024, 9:59:14 PM3/19/24
to Simon Peyton Jones, Andres Löh, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
The rules in force for this vote are at the very bottom of https://gitlab.haskell.org/hf/meta/-/blob/main/board.md?ref_type=heads . They say that interacting with the MR but not clicking Approve is treated as a "no" vote.

As of this writing, everyone who has voted has voted "yes". The following board members have not voted:

- Ed
- Evie
- Emily
- Ryan
- Hazel
- Josh

Please do chime in, folks!

Thanks,
Richard

Edward Kmett

unread,
Mar 19, 2024, 11:54:49 PM3/19/24
to Richard Eisenberg, Simon Peyton Jones, Andres Löh, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board

Simon Peyton Jones

unread,
Mar 20, 2024, 3:54:42 AM3/20/24
to Richard Eisenberg, Andres Löh, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
The rules in force for this vote are at the very bottom of https://gitlab.haskell.org/hf/meta/-/blob/main/board.md?ref_type=heads . They say that interacting with the MR but not clicking Approve is treated as a "no" vote.

That's ok -- but I'm arguing, in addition, that no/abstain votes should somehow be explicit, so that the Secretary can remind non-voters.

A non-voter who ignores reminders is treated as no/abstain, fine, but it's bad to have a mechanism that inadvertently trigger a "no" result when all that it means is that members of the board are on holiday, or otherwise unavailable at the particular moment.

Simon

Andres Löh

unread,
Mar 20, 2024, 2:13:24 PM3/20/24
to Simon Peyton Jones, Richard Eisenberg, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
Another update:

(FWIW, I agree with Simon in that I think it's a good idea in general to encourage people to make an explicit statement.)

As far as I can see, we have 9 votes for yes now, still one vote short of a 2/3 majority.

Nobody seems to have voted "no" explicitly, we are still missing any reaction from:

- Evie
- Emily
- Ryan
- Hazel
- Josh

It would be great if as many of you as possible could still give some kind of explicit indication of your vote (yes, no, abstain) today.

Thanks!

Andres

Hazel Weakly

unread,
Mar 20, 2024, 7:55:35 PM3/20/24
to Andres Löh, Simon Peyton Jones, Richard Eisenberg, 'Ryan Trinkle' via Haskell Foundation Board
My apologies on the late response. I voted yes on the board proposal

Ryan Trinkle

unread,
Mar 20, 2024, 9:08:11 PM3/20/24
to bo...@haskell.foundation

I vote yes, which I think is redundant at this point.

Richard Eisenberg

unread,
Mar 27, 2024, 9:51:25 PM3/27/24
to Ryan Trinkle, bo...@haskell.foundation
Great -- thanks, all.

I've merged the MR, accepting the proposal.

Richard

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages