Packages missing

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Goran Mekić

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 5:29:47 AM7/28/18
to us...@hardenedbsd.org
Hello,

I just switched to HardenedBSD on one of my machines and pkg can not
find rust and firefox. Is it atentional, and if so, why?

In the mean time, I'm building it from ports, so wish me luck! :o)

Regards,
meka
signature.asc

Goran Mekić

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 5:42:50 AM7/28/18
to us...@hardenedbsd.org
I'm sorry for half info here, I promice I'll never write right after
getting up :o)

# uname -a
FreeBSD thinker.home.meka.rs 11.2-STABLE-HBSD FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE-HBSD #0 [STABLE:HardenedBSD-11-STABLE-v1100056.1]: Sun Jul 22 01:49:48 UTC 2018 ro...@nyi-01.build.hardenedbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HARDENEDBSD amd64
signature.asc

Shawn Webb

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 8:39:00 AM7/28/18
to Goran Meki??, us...@hardenedbsd.org
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Goran Meki?? wrote:
lang/rust failed to build due to the inclusion of an unneeded patch.
We've fixed it since the last package build:
https://github.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedbsd-ports/commit/6b4068b8803a7a9ce2dbb37140a2bbec17b8e4d9

Since www/firefox depends on lang/rust, the build of www/firefox was
skipped.

A new 12-CURRENT/amd64 package build started yesterday. I'll queue up
an 11-STABLE/amd64 package build to start immediately after this one
finishes. Both lang/rust and www/firefox should exist in the repo
afterwards.

Thanks,

--
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

Tor-ified Signal: +1 443-546-8752
Tor+XMPP+OTR: lat...@is.a.hacker.sx
GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE
signature.asc

Goran Mekić

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 9:22:20 AM7/28/18
to Shawn Webb, us...@hardenedbsd.org
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 08:38:16AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Goran Meki?? wrote:
> lang/rust failed to build due to the inclusion of an unneeded patch.
> We've fixed it since the last package build:
> https://github.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedbsd-ports/commit/6b4068b8803a7a9ce2dbb37140a2bbec17b8e4d9
>
> Since www/firefox depends on lang/rust, the build of www/firefox was
> skipped.
>
> A new 12-CURRENT/amd64 package build started yesterday. I'll queue up
> an 11-STABLE/amd64 package build to start immediately after this one
> finishes. Both lang/rust and www/firefox should exist in the repo
> afterwards.
>
> Thanks,

I thought it's something like that. As tilda.center has two servers that
don't do anything (they are literally shut down because they have
nothing to do) and I plan to put HardenedBSD on them, do you think we
can offload something? Building chromium, for example? Or maybe
something more usefull? We're currently behind ISP NAT, but there's an
option to pay extra $3 for static IP and no-NAT. Upload is still crap at
around 4Mbit/s, though. As electricity here is so cheap, we almost so no
increase on the bill, so we can do something lenthy on them, too (build
for one arch?). The server specs:

2 x 8 cores @ 1.7GHz
64GB RAM
2 x 500GB HDD

It's an older machine, obviously, but there are two of them and I'd love
them to contribute something for more people than just me or the
hackerspace. If you think we can utilize them to help HardenedBSD
project, I'll start preparations for the air conditioning in the room.

Regards,
meka
signature.asc

Shawn Webb

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 9:48:49 AM7/28/18
to Goran Meki??, us...@hardenedbsd.org
I appreciate the offer, but due to a healthy amount of paranoia, I'd
prefer to only perform official tasks on HardenedBSD-owned
infrastructure.

Building official packages for HardenedBSD requires private
cryptographic key material (for a cryptographically signed package
repo). I simply can't trust third parties to properly secure or not
leak the key material.

Instead, what we could perhaps do is use one of those servers as a
package and/or binary update mirror. Would you be open to that?
signature.asc

Goran Mekić

unread,
Jul 28, 2018, 2:28:58 PM7/28/18
to Shawn Webb, us...@hardenedbsd.org
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 09:48:07AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Instead, what we could perhaps do is use one of those servers as a
> package and/or binary update mirror. Would you be open to that?
Why not. I'll let you know once we have them up and running. I suppose I
should install 12-CURRENT?
signature.asc
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages