There’s always this if you have a pcmcia slot http://www.amazon.com/SCM-Microsystems-SCR-243-SCR243-READER/dp/B001HQ90FC/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1408029723&sr=8-6&keywords=smart+card+reader+pcmcia
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Blabber+u...@hacdc.org.
Possible speaker? How? Ie, you had a conversation with him?
On 08/14/2014 06:56 AM, Derek LaHousse wrote:
> >> >> When you call the little chip a SIM card, you are wrong. It's
> >> >> fine
I didn't call it one, I said it looks like one. As in, it strongly
resembles one.
As well as advertise at colleges, if anyone knows any academics that deal with crypto, privacy, identity, internet behavior, electronic law, etc - I think these are all valid cryptoparty topics and would make awesome talks from researchers.
P's - we really need some legal expertise at these events - don't need to speak just pipe up when conversation ventures into legal stuff.
P'ps - I'd really love one on identity
--
--
Like what we do? Support HacDC by becoming a member. Learn more here: http://hacdc.org/membership/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the HacDC "Blabber" group.
To post to this group, send email to Bla...@hacdc.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Blabber+u...@hacdc.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/a/hacdc.org/group/Blabber
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Blabber+u...@hacdc.org.
OK, I'm pretty sure I know who did put the 'tbd' lines there, but... I don't really like the idea of giving people talk titles. I don't think anyone should remove something someone else puts on these docs (that isn't offensive) without some conversation. So, I think the point of these 'tbd's is to say "I've contacted these people to talk" - while I'm meh on the idea of preventing duplicate people contacting the same potential speaker, I think the better way to do this would be to create a notes field where you can say 'I've contacted this person with this idea - bug the hell out of them or don't duplicate my effort'. And then everything else is left blank until potential speaker says 'I'm talking about this' (if they didn't just fill out their spot, you can do it for them).
Cool?
If so, make it so....
Shawn said:"Does anyone have any other protocols you think might useful for someone who doesn't have ftp/sftp/rsync (again - not doing http)."Why are you interested in any protocol at all except the one that absolutely everyone already knows how to use?
So, we should be able to get a cert your browser will trust for this,
so I'll have an https download portal for all of this stuff (I'll have
an excuse to write a tiny web app with Starman too - yay)
My point is that fighting against HTTP/S is a losing fight. Instead we should focus on making it suck less.
I think we should make a schedule. We're lining up a lot of talks (7 hours + now). We can't tell potential speakers that the event starts at 2pm when their slot might not be until 5 or 7pm.