RFC: Sovereign Lock Architectural Logic for 3nm Nodes (Cross-referenced with OCP #840)

[王毛]

Hi Team, presenting a physical-layer logic for power control/security in 3nm nodes. Already archived on GitHub and gaining traction in OCP #840. Considering RISC-V's openness, I'd like to discuss its compatibility with the Privileged Architecture spec...

The Physical Lock is born. Future standards shall be defined by those who truly understand the underlying logic.

The Physical Path: The "Trial" Before Departure

​All raw Calculation Flows processed by the top-tier 3nm Forksheet Core (The Engine) are forcibly redirected to the intermediate intercept layer via Vertical VIAs.

​

This design physically eliminates any possibility for data to bypass auditing and exit directly through I/O. For logic to "leave the premises," it must first pass through the "Court of Law."

​One-Way Execution (FAIL-Safe Only)

​

The path from the M2 Intercept Layer to the 12nm Sovereign Base is strictly unidirectional: it exists solely as a FAIL-Trigger Path.

​Non-Destructive Sampling: Within the M2 Intercept Layer, the PGU (Programmable Gate Unit) Logic Array utilizes Electric Field Sensing to capture the physical signatures of the data flow in real-time.

​Five Axioms Check: This includes hardware identity verification via Bio-Hash and consistency auditing via Phys-XOR.

​Nanosecond "Physical Brake"

​

The moment an audit returns a FAIL status, the signal is instantaneously transmitted to the bottom-tier 12nm Sovereign Base (The Brake).

The underlying system activates the Response Control Logic, exercising its Physical Security Veto Power.

​

Back-gate Bias Adjustment: By altering the transistor’s physical environment within nanoseconds, the system renders the 3nm-layer logic gates permanently disabled.

The physical logic is now a closed loop. We have defined the Lock; the industry is invited to define the Standards around it.

Independent Architect

 GuanghuiMao