Public review ended for Zicfilp and Zicfiss extensions.
140 views
Skip to first unread message
Georgios Christou
unread,
Apr 29, 2024, 8:35:49 AMApr 29
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to tech-a...@lists.riscv.org, tech-a...@lists.riscv.org, tech-ss...@lists.riscv.org, Ved Shanbhogue
Greetings!
The review period for Zicfiss and Zicfilp extension spec.
concluded on April 27.
During the review period there were the following question and suggestion:
- An idea was suggested in [1] to reduce code size by
including additional functionality into sspush/sspopchk.
Following further discussion, it was concluded that no
change is required as the expected code size benefits
may not accrue.
- In [2] there was a question if ARC has reviewed the use of
henvcfg/menvcfg for Zicfiss/Zicfilp control bits and if they
change their scope. This question was also discussed on
the Priv. list [3] and concluded that the design choice is
consistent.
We extend our thanks to all who contributed valuable insights
during the review.