Public review ended for Zicfilp and Zicfiss extensions.

[Georgios Christou]

Greetings!

The review period for Zicfiss and Zicfilp extension spec.
concluded on April 27.

During the review period there were the following question and suggestion:
- An idea was suggested in [1] to reduce code size by
   including additional functionality into sspush/sspopchk.
   Following further discussion, it was concluded that no
   change is required as the expected code size benefits
   may not accrue.
- In [2] there was a question if ARC has reviewed the use of
   henvcfg/menvcfg for Zicfiss/Zicfilp control bits and if they
   change their scope. This question was also discussed on
   the Priv. list [3] and concluded that the design choice is

   consistent.

We extend our thanks to all who contributed valuable insights
during the review.

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi/issues/219
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi/issues/220

[3] https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-privileged/message/1905

Kind regards,

George, Ved