--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RISC-V ISA Dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isa-dev+u...@groups.riscv.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/d/msgid/isa-dev/eb7a766f-16d4-47c6-a056-f77c853a0c1cn%40groups.riscv.org.
RISC-V follows IEEE-754-2008. If anything is different that would be a bug.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RISC-V ISA Dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isa-dev+u...@groups.riscv.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/d/msgid/isa-dev/3d9dfb9d-993c-4369-841b-415d03720ba5n%40groups.riscv.org.
Isn't that reverting to the 1985 spec for max and min?
--
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/d/msgid/isa-dev/ad5e001f-6f48-4b31-bdf6-4bc7d47b8c66n%40groups.riscv.org.
If two or more inputs are NaN, then the payload of the resulting NaN should be identical to the payload of
one of the input NaNs if representable in the destination format. This standard does not specify which of
the input NaNs will provide the payload.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/d/msgid/isa-dev/CAPPvrXdkTONkYXzV1eX-cqPCDP%3DVmB90LcE3B5e1SPZQJQYNhQ%40mail.gmail.com.