This is the latest status of ballots since the last Teleconference.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/0bfd9912-533c-4bed-872b-77daa13304ae%40harica.gr.
Hi Dimitris,
- Is it possible to add https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/588 to the agenda - or to allocate some time for discussion during "Any Other Business"?
- We presented what will now be referred to as SC-090 at last week's Validation Subcommittee - and have since gotten two endorsers. While we do not plan to move forward until SC-088 has finished voting, could we please add this to the ballot tracking table going forward for broader awareness?
Thanks for your consideration!
Of course. Please check the link in 1. because it points to an issue related to sunsetting 7.1.2.4 Technically Constrained Precertificate Signing CA Certificate Profile. You may consider creating a PR in the servercert main repo to track discussion and comments.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/01d850fc-c193-4da1-befa-cd880524d3e3%40harica.gr.
Of course. Please check the link in 1. because it points to an issue related to sunsetting 7.1.2.4 Technically Constrained Precertificate Signing CA Certificate Profile. You may consider creating a PR in the servercert main repo to track discussion and comments.
The intent is to discuss the sunset of Precertificate Signing CAs. While we opened the issue several months ago, there's timely discussion taking place in the CT community (e.g., here) that make a compelling case for action.
This discussion is unrelated to SC-090.
I've opened PRs for both proposals.