DCV/CAA logging currently is defined very broadly, leaving it unclear if DNSSEC verification logs are in scope or not. Additionally, DNS resolvers are not built for extensive logging.
This ballot aims to carve-out the logging requirements for DNSSEC specifically, stating these are not in scope. For audit purposes, change management logging is able to confirm if the appropriate controls are in effect or not.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Roman Fischer (SwissSign) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.1.9 as specified in the following redline:
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/SA1PR17MB650347AB4795BA7FF0A97425E384A%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
TWCA votes “Yes” on ballot SC-096.
Regards,
Sean Huang
Senior R&D Engineer
TEL:02-2370-8886#728
FAX:02-2388-6720
Email:or...@twca.com.tw

10F., No. 85, Yanping South Road,
Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
--
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/a488387b-2794-45cd-8e04-b6e474461cdf%40harica.gr.
IdenTrust votes “Yes” on SC-096:
Marco S.
TrustID Program Manager
--
Chunghwa Telecom votes “Yes” on SC-096.
Regards,
Tsung-Min Kuo
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
From: 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 12:14 AM
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate
WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Subject: [外部郵件][Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/SA1PR17MB650347AB4795BA7FF0A97425E384A%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
GoDaddy votes Yes on SC-096.
Cheers,
Steven
From:
'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 at 11:14
AM
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
Summary DCV/CAA logging currently is defined very broadly, leaving it unclear if DNSSEC verification logs are in scope or not. Additionally, DNS resolvers are not built for extensive logging. This ballot aims to carve-out the logging requirements
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
--
SSL.com votes “Yes” on SC-096.
From: 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 10:14 AM
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
--
|
CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not open the links or the attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
|
Regards.
Date: 2026-01-08 00:14Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
Date: 2026/01/08 01:14:16
From: "'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)"
To: "'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)"
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/SA1PR17MB650347AB4795BA7FF0A97425E384A%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
SECOM Trust Systems votes YES on Ballot SC-096.
Best regards,
ONO Fumiaki / 大野 文彰
(Japanese name order: family name first, in uppercase)
SECOM Trust Systems CO., LTD.
From: 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 1:14 AM
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
--
Hi Dimitris,
what is the reason that the voting should end a day earlier than it is listed there - End time: 2026-01-14 16:15 UTC?
Regards
Peter Miskovic
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/969a7660-e5d3-4278-9b57-6934cf852154%40harica.gr.
//Antti
DZ.
Jan 13, 2026 14:03:22 'Peter Miškovič' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>:
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/683b391a4f6f468ba37b837f37038531%40disig.sk.
D-Trust votes „Yes“ on Ballot SC-096.
Thanks,
Enrico
--
Hi Dimitris,
if you mean „SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements“, then the end date is as I mentioned - 2026-01-14 16:15 UTC
Voting ends 2026-01-15 16:15 UTC is for SC094v2: DNSSEC exception in email DCV methods.
Regards
Peter
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/f13c8270-8657-4888-9f84-a9d037bb5a81%40harica.gr.
DZ.
Jan 13, 2026 14:33:17 'Peter Miškovič' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>:
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/b001fe82d14b4aa89120222c11e27547%40disig.sk.
GlobalSign votes “Yes” on Ballot SC-096.
Christophe
--
Certum votes YES on Ballot SC-096
Kind regards,
Kateryna Aleksieieva
Summary
DCV/CAA logging currently is defined very broadly, leaving it unclear if DNSSEC verification logs are in scope or not. Additionally, DNS resolvers are not built for extensive logging.
This ballot aims to carve-out the logging requirements for DNSSEC specifically, stating these are not in scope. For audit purposes, change management logging is able to confirm if the appropriate controls are in effect or not.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Roman Fischer (SwissSign) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.1.9 as specified in the following redline:
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
Start time: 2025-12-15 12:15 UTC End time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTCVote for approval (7 days)
Start time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTC End time: 2026-01-14 16:15 UTC
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/SA1PR17MB650347AB4795BA7FF0A97425E384A%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.
On Jan 7, 2026, at 8:14 AM, 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org> wrote:
Summary
DCV/CAA logging currently is defined very broadly, leaving it unclear if DNSSEC verification logs are in scope or not. Additionally, DNS resolvers are not built for extensive logging.
This ballot aims to carve-out the logging requirements for DNSSEC specifically, stating these are not in scope. For audit purposes, change management logging is able to confirm if the appropriate controls are in effect or not.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Roman Fischer (SwissSign) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.1.9 as specified in the following redline:
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
Start time: 2025-12-15 12:15 UTC
End time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
Start time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTC
End time: 2026-01-14 16:15 UTC
Disig votes „YES“ on ballot „SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements“
Regards
Peter Miskovic
From: 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Sent: streda 7. januára 2026 17:14
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
Summary
DCV/CAA logging currently is defined very broadly, leaving it unclear if DNSSEC verification logs are in scope or not. Additionally, DNS resolvers are not built for extensive logging.
This ballot aims to carve-out the logging requirements for DNSSEC specifically, stating these are not in scope. For audit purposes, change management logging is able to confirm if the appropriate controls are in effect or not.
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Roman Fischer (SwissSign) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" ("Baseline Requirements") based on Version 2.1.9 as specified in the following redline:
Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
Start time: 2025-12-15 12:15 UTC
End time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
Start time: 2026-01-07 16:15 UTC
Certigna votes “YES” on Ballot SC-096.
Josselin.
De : 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Envoyé : mercredi 7 janvier 2026 17:14
À : 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <server...@groups.cabforum.org>
Objet : [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins: SC-096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging requirements
⚠ FR : Ce message provient de l'extérieur de l'organisation. N'ouvrez pas de liens ou de pièces jointes à moins que vous ne sachiez que le contenu est fiable. ⚠
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
servercert-w...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/servercert-wg/SA1PR17MB650347AB4795BA7FF0A97425E384A%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.