Final Minutes for Server Certificate Working Group Meeting April 9, 2026

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)]

These are the final minutes of the teleconference described in the subject of this message as prepared by Sandy Balzer (SwissSign). 

Attendees

Tadahiko ITO-SECOM, Wayne Thayer, Luis Cervantes (SSL.com), Luis Osses (Amazon Trust Services), Mahua Chaudhuri (Microsoft), Sandy Balzer - SwissSign, Michael Slaughter (Amazon Trust Services), Sean Huang (TWCA), Janet Hines - SSL.com, Rebecca Kelley - SSL, Karolina Ruszczynska - Certum, Greg Tomko (GlobalSign), Jozef Nigut - Disig, Sándor SZŐKE, dr. (Microsec), Enrico Entschew/ D-Trust, Ben Wilson - Mozilla, Adam Folsom, Dustin Hollenback, Kateryna Aleksieieva (Certum by Asseco), Tobias Josefowitz (Opera), Inigo Barreira, Jos Purvis (Fastly), Dean, Trevoli Ponds-White [Amazon Trust Services], wendy brown - FPKIMA, Stephen Davidson (DigiCert), Peter Miskovic - Disig, Scott Rea - eMudhra, Roman Fischer - SwissSign, Paul van Brouwershaven (Digitorus), [WISeKey] Jaime Hablutzel, Rich Smith (DigiCert), Aaron Gable (ISRG), Steven Deitte - GoDaddy, Lucy Buecking - IdenTrust, Nome Huang-TrustAsia, Chad Dandar, Atsushi INABA - GlobalSign, Hogeun Yoo - NAVER Cloud Trust Services, Clint Wilson, Corey Bonnell [DigiCert], ONO Fumiaki - SECOM Trust Systems, Nate Smith - GoDaddy, Jeff Ward (Aprio), Georgy Sebastian(AWS), Lilia Dubko, Cynetheia Brown(FPKIMA), Rollin Yu - TrustAsia, Alvin.Wang(SHECA), Antti Backman - Telia Company, Tim Callan (Sectigo), Chunghwa Telecom / Tsung-Min Kuo.

Minutes

Meeting Logistics

• Wayne Thayer leading the Meeting as Dimitris is not available.
• Minute taker: Sandy Balzer
• Wayne Thayer read the note-well.
• No changes were requested for the agenda.
• Minutes approval
• February 26, 2026 - these Draft minutes have not been distributed yet
• F2F#67 March 10, 2026 - Draft minutes have not been distributed yet, compilation pending. Participants reminded to upload missing notes and presentations to Etherpad / provide to chairs.
• Final minutes do March 26, 2026 (Draft minutes were distributed on 2026-03-31)
  No objections and minutes approved.

 

Membership Applications

• No Membership applications, one was received but it was not complete.

 

Ballots

 

In Discussion Period

 

SC098: Process RFC 8657 CAA Parameters

The ballot was in discussion and largely considered ready for voting. A comment was received about disambiguating the validation methods and concern for potential confusion, and Wayne pointed out that with a statement that says if a CA performs domain validation using a mechanism that can be represented by multiple labels, the CA should accept any of the labels as granting permission to issue.

Dimitris suggested that clarity could be improved by defining the ACME DNS‑01 validation method as a BR validation method and proposed holding this ballot until a separate ballot encoding this ACME method in the BRs is completed.

Aaron Gable stated that the ambiguity is largely theoretical and unlikely to cause practical issues, noting that a CA would not accept the DNS‑01 label unless it implements the ACME DNS‑01 validation method. He cautioned that defining DNS‑01 as a separate BR validation method could introduce overlapping validation methods and additional audit and logging complexity. He suggested adjusting the example language rather than adding a new BR validation method.

Wayne welcomed feedback and stated his opinion that defining DNS‑01 as a BR validation method is not necessary.

Corey Bonnell stated that ACME DNS-01 is a constrained profile of BR method 7 and expressed concern that ambiguity could lead to compliance incidents. He supported defining DNS-01 explicitly as a BR method for clarity.

Michael Slaughter agreed that the issue warranted further consideration and supported handling DNS-01 in a separate discussion to avoid unintended consequences.

Wayne summarized that he would update the example language as suggested, restart the discussion period, and proceed without further delay. Feedback was welcomed. Wayne stated his opinion that defining DNS‑01 as a BR method is not necessary.

 

• SC099: Improve Recording of Validation Method

Aaron Gable reported that SC-99 remained in the discussion period. He noted significant comments from Ryan Hurst opposing the approach and a response supporting the ballot. No additional technical objections were raised during the meeting beyond the comments already noted.

Inigo Barreira raised a concern regarding the proposed July effective date, referencing informal summer timing considerations. Aaron stated he was unaware of any formal agreement on summer freezes and preferred not to restart the ballot based on unwritten conventions.

Trevoli Ponds‑White stated that the ballot primarily clarified existing expectations and did not require significant code changes. She indicated she was open to moving the effective date if strong consensus emerged.

Wayne stated that members who felt strongly about changing the effective date should comment on the mailing list before the discussion period ended. Otherwise, the ballot would proceed.

Aaron noted that the discussion period for SC‑099 was expected to conclude the following day, after which the ballot would be moved to the voting stage unless additional concerns were raised.

About informal or unwritten conventions (e.g. summer timing considerations), participants noted that these practices are not documented and that there is no formal consensus. It was suggested that such conventions should either be discussed at a future face‑to‑face meeting or formalized through a ballot and incorporated into the bylaws. 

Cleared IPR review, new Guidelines

• SC095: Clean-up 2025 (cleared IPR Review for the TLS BRs). BRs 2.2.6 were released.

Wayne reported that the original IPR review covered only the TLS Baseline Requirements and did not include the EV Guidelines. The TLS BR portion has cleared IPR review and BR version 2.2.6 has been released. To correct this issue, a new IPR review period has been initiated for the EV Guidelines portion.

 

Draft / Under Consideration

• SC087: Registration Number Improvement for EV Certificates (Corey)

On hold pending SC‑95 IPR completion.

• SC0XX: Cleanup for ADN CNAME (Aaron)

Deferred due to time.

• SC0XX: Improve Certificate Problem Reports and Clarify the Meaning of Revocation (Martijn)

No Update.

• SC0XX: Update Revocation timeline for errors affecting CP/CPS deviations but in accordance with the BRs (Dimitris)

No Update.

• SC0XX: Modernize EVG Domain Ownership Reuse Requirement to Reference Section 3.2.2.7 (Dustin)

Draft in progress; removed from agenda until ready.

 

Any other business

Wayne Thayer asked for any other business and stated that the next Server Certificate Working Group call is scheduled for 23 April.

Wayne adjourned the Server Certificate Working Group meeting and handed the meeting over to Dean to continue with the CA/Browser Forum plenary session.