(UPDATE #1) Final CA/Browser Forum SCWG agenda - Thursday, November 6, 2025 at 11:00 am Eastern Time

64 views
Skip to first unread message

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)

unread,
Nov 6, 2025, 6:54:39 AMNov 6
to CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List

[Adding one more membership application for today's call].

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. 

Dean Coclin (Digicert) will take minutes and Corey Bonnel (Digicert) is up next.
  1. Begin Recording - Roll Call
  2. Read note-well
  3. Review of Agenda
  4. Minutes approval
    • October 16, 2025 F2F#66 (Draft minutes have not been distributed yet)
  5. Membership applications
    • Ronald Koorn (Interested Party, individual)
    • Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA), previously known as National Center for Digital Certification (NCDC) (Root Certificate Issuer)
    • Digitorus (Interested Party, organization)
  6. Ballot Status – see list below
  7. Any Other Business
  8. Next call: November 20, 2025
  9. Adjourn

Current status of Ballots

This is the latest status of ballots since the last meeting.

In Discussion Period

  • SC090: Gradually sunset all remaining email-based, phone-based, and 'crossover' validation methods from Sections 3.2.2.4 and 3.2.2.5 (Ryan)
  • SC091: Sunset 3.2.2.5.3 Reverse Address Lookup Validation, proposal of new DNS-based validation using Persistent DCV TXT Record for IP addresses

In Voting Period

  • SC086: Sunset the Inclusion of Address and Routing Parameter Area Names (Corey)

Under IPR review

  • SC088: Persistent DNS DCV (Slaughter) (IPR Review ends 2025-11-08 18:00:00 UTC)

Cleared IPR review, new Guidelines

  • SC092: Sunset use of Precertificate Signing CAs (BRs 2.1.8 was published)

Draft / Under Consideration

  • SC087: Registration Number Improvement for EV Certificates (Corey)
  • SC0XX: Cleanup for ADN CNAME use (Rich)
  • SC0XX: Improve Certificate Problem Reports and Clarify the Meaning of Revocation (Martijn)
  • SC0XX: Validation method in TLS Certificates (Clint)

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages