Results of Review Period – Ballot SC085v2: Require DNSSEC for CAA and DCV Lookups
232 views
Skip to first unread message
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
unread,
Jul 21, 2025, 12:35:59 PMJul 21
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Dear Members,
The IPR Review Period for Ballot Ballot SC085: Require DNSSEC for CAA
and DCV Lookups, has ended, and no Exclusion Notices were filed. Ballot
SC085 became effective as of 2025-07-21.
The Baseline Requirements Version 2.1.6 is attached (clean and redline),
and have been published on the public website.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum), Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
Hi, Dimitris - the redlined version of v2.1.6 includes a "DRAFT" watermark and also does not appear to include the actual redlined text. Could we get an updated version posted to the CABF site that highlights changes for this version?
Cheers,
Aaron
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
unread,
Jul 24, 2025, 1:03:45 PMJul 24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Aaron Poulsen, Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)
On 7/24/2025 6:54 PM, Aaron Poulsen
wrote:
Hi, Dimitris - the redlined version of v2.1.6 includes a "DRAFT"
watermark and also does not appear to include the actual redlined
text. Could we get an updated version posted to the CABF site that
highlights changes for this version?
Hi Aaron, I accidentally uploaded the redline that came from the
current GitHub "actions" automation instead of the one I manually
created. I just uploaded the correct one.