Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)

aha I understand. I tought it would be considered ”spammy” to raise ”the same issue” in parallel in

Sending the final agenda for the archive. Server Certificate Working Group Take attendance, read anti

Hi Mark, Please try sending your message again - I just gave you permission to post to public@

Ono-san, Thank you, I had the exact same question. But I also approached it from the opposite

Server Certificate Working Group Take attendance, read anti-trust statement, minute taker(s) Review

Thank you for the clarifications Aaron and Henry, as long as the diversity is sufficient I don't

NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser

The voting period for SC095v3: Clean-up 2025 has completed. The ballot has: PASSED Voting Results

[Final Minutes] Server Certificate Working Group Call, 29 January 2026 Minutes by Jos Purvis (Fastly)

These are the final minutes of the teleconference described in the subject of this message as

iTrusChina votes "Yes" on Ballot SC-095v3. qi_ji...@itrus.com.cn From: 'Kateryna

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) is scheduled to take

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC-097: Sunset all remaining use of SHA-1 signatures

On 2/24/2026 2:50 PM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote: Here is the draft agenda for the subject

Personally, I think its fine to keep around. Not everyone will want a persistent authorization for

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC094v2: DNSSEC exception in email DCV methods, has

Hi Martijn and all, I am pretty sure I am the author of the line in question from the ballot. The

On Feb 12, 2026, at 7:41 PM, 'Aaron Gable' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) <

I agree that a plain reading of the last sentence you quoted would disallow any use of the "No

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Janet Hines (VikingCloud) is scheduled to take minutes

Here is the draft agenda for the subject call. Jos Purvis (Fastly) is scheduled to take minutes and

Hi Kateryna, Check out the "Compare Changes" section in https://wiki.cabforum.org/books/

Given that the clean-up ballot is still being tweaked, I'm going to hold off on starting the

SCWG call January 15th 2026 Attendees Aaron Gable - (Let's Encrypt) Adam Folson - (IdenTrust)

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Janet Hines (VikingCloud) is scheduled to take minutes

Summary of the Ballot This ballot introduces a set of updates across the Baseline Requirements and EV

Here is the draft agenda for the subject call. Janet Hines (VikingCloud) is scheduled to take minutes

NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser

The voting period for SC097: Sunset all remaining use of SHA-1 signatures in Certificates and CRLs