Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum)

Cisco votes "Yes" on Ballot SC-099. Chad Dandar Cisco From: 'Aaron Gable' via

Hi Mark, >Then, later when the CA is explicitly trusted, you shorten the chain. While true in

Hi CyhaHung, all, We have experienced the same behavior on IIS / Windows, and in our case we have

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Sandy Balzer (SwissSign) is scheduled to take minutes

Here is the draft agenda for the subject call. Sandy Balzer (SwissSign) is scheduled to take minutes

Ryan, I addressed all of these points in my presentation at the CABF F2F on March 10. The slides are

As Aaron correct highlighted in this thread, there is some subtlety in the BRs around the mapping

NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser

Dear Members, I just realized the review period did not include the Draft EV Guidelines that was also

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC095v3: Clean-up 2025, has ended, and no Exclusion

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Michelle Coon (OATI) is scheduled to take minutes and

The draft minutes from February 12, 2026 were distributed on February 13, 2026 and approved and

Sounds good, thanks! DZ. Mar 12, 2026 14:47:59 'Martijn Katerbarg' via Server Certificate WG

On 3/12/2026 6:02 AM, 'Sebastian Robin Nielsen' via Server Certificate WG (CA/B Forum) wrote:

Sending the final agenda for the archive. Server Certificate Working Group Take attendance, read anti

Hi Mark, Please try sending your message again - I just gave you permission to post to public@

Ono-san, Thank you, I had the exact same question. But I also approached it from the opposite

Server Certificate Working Group Take attendance, read anti-trust statement, minute taker(s) Review

Thank you for the clarifications Aaron and Henry, as long as the diversity is sufficient I don't

The voting period for SC095v3: Clean-up 2025 has completed. The ballot has: PASSED Voting Results

[Final Minutes] Server Certificate Working Group Call, 29 January 2026 Minutes by Jos Purvis (Fastly)

These are the final minutes of the teleconference described in the subject of this message as

iTrusChina votes "Yes" on Ballot SC-095v3. qi_ji...@itrus.com.cn From: 'Kateryna

Here is the final agenda for the subject call. Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) is scheduled to take

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC-097: Sunset all remaining use of SHA-1 signatures

On 2/24/2026 2:50 PM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote: Here is the draft agenda for the subject

Personally, I think its fine to keep around. Not everyone will want a persistent authorization for

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC096: Carve-out for DNSSEC verification logging

Dear Members, The IPR Review Period for Ballot SC094v2: DNSSEC exception in email DCV methods, has

Hi Martijn and all, I am pretty sure I am the author of the line in question from the ballot. The