AI-Generated Minutes

[Ben Wilson]

As discussed on today's call, I have created a raw, unedited output of today's minutes using ChatGPT v.4o (Enterprise version which doesn't allow ChatGPT to train from the data I input). It also created a markdown version, which I saved in this folder - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vEtA_EObz3UGfGFVcHtTVnxy1IzANK7e?usp=sharing

Ben

[Inigo Barreira]

Very interesting.

I´m in the list of the persons who spoke but my comment was not added in the minutes or was not recorded (I said that the NetSec WG does not publish its minutes and is a WG) but I think this is a very good transcript of the recording.

 

De: 'Ben Wilson' via Infrastructure (CA/B Forum) <infrast...@groups.cabforum.org>
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de febrero de 2025 18:47
Para: infrast...@groups.cabforum.org
Asunto: [Infrastructure] AI-Generated Minutes

 

As discussed on today's call, I have created a raw, unedited output of today's minutes using ChatGPT v. 4o (Enterprise version which doesn't allow ChatGPT to train from the data I input). It also created a markdown version, which

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization.     Report Suspicious    ‌

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

As discussed on today's call, I have created a raw, unedited output of today's minutes using ChatGPT v.4o (Enterprise version which doesn't allow ChatGPT to train from the data I input). It also created a markdown version, which I saved in this folder - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vEtA_EObz3UGfGFVcHtTVnxy1IzANK7e?usp=sharing

Ben

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Infrastructure (CA/B Forum)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to infrastructur...@groups.cabforum.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/infrastructure/CA%2B1gtab2XtK_g_mAsv2AQwykciWuZa%3DaxEirFH-zBf5pmkz%2Beg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Martijn Katerbarg]

Yea, this is a good step. I think with some additional prompting, we could even fine tune it further if we need.

 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/infrastructure/DM4PR17MB6160566C51B3F24D7E90876F81C52%40DM4PR17MB6160.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.

[Wayne Thayer]

I agree that this is pretty close to the point where we could use it without a human review. A point that we touched on but that the AI didn't catch is that we'd ideally automate this so that we don't need to assign minute takers - the system would just automatically publish draft minutes.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/infrastructure/SA1PR17MB6503C3C551FED358115A4139E3C42%40SA1PR17MB6503.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.

[Ben Wilson]

The prompt could specify a format/template to follow, for consistency.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/groups.cabforum.org/d/msgid/infrastructure/CAPh8bk8dTEb6DwgQKSV01c-%2B4i1S1pboMmxNH%3DDw%2Bva3uq%3DZQQ%40mail.gmail.com.