[Infrastructure] RV: [cabfquest] Membership Application of Common Crypto Authority

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Inigo Barreira

unread,
Feb 25, 2024, 11:55:05 PMFeb 25
to Ben Wilson via Infrastructure

All,

 

This is what I´ve just indicated at the F2F. And it´s in relation to allow Interested Parties to the wiki, because if so, then no need to send another invitation. They have the Webex info and then may join if they want, and we´re not checking if this attendee is an IP or a full member.

But at the end, the only difference is that they can´t vote.

 

Regards

De: Wayne Thayer <wth...@fastly.com>
Enviado el: lunes, 5 de febrero de 2024 21:29
Para: Inigo Barreira <Inigo.B...@sectigo.com>
Asunto: Re: [cabfquest] Membership Application of Common Crypto Authority

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Hi Inigo,

 

I've given Troy Posting rights on the servercert-wg mailing list.

 

I'm not clear on allowing Interested Parties to attend the teleconferences. The Forum Bylaws say they must be invited to Forum teleconferences by the Chair, but the SCWG Charter is silent on the matter. I believe IPs should be able to attend SCWG meetings without a special invitation, but since we use the same meeting for both SCWG and Forum, the rules aren't so clear.

 

If Troy should be allowed to attend the SCWG teleconferences, then someone will need to send the WebEx info to him because IPs do not get wiki access.

 

Thanks,

 

Wayne

 

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:07AM Inigo Barreira <Inigo.B...@sectigo.com> wrote:

Wayne, please, can you grant whatever access Troy may need for the SCWG?

 

Regards

 

De: Inigo Barreira
Enviado el: lunes, 5 de febrero de 2024 12:06
Para: troy anderson <tran...@ccauth.org>; ques...@cabforum.org
Asunto: RE: [cabfquest] Membership Application of Common Crypto Authority

 

Hi Troy,

 

In the last SCWG meeting, it was agreed to include you as an Interested Party also for the Servercert working group.

 

Regards

 

De: Questions <question...@cabforum.org> En nombre de troy anderson via Questions
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2024 18:36
Para: ques...@cabforum.org
Asunto: [cabfquest] Membership Application of Common Crypto Authority

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

thank you for reviewing my application to become an 'Interested Party' to the following Working Groups of the CA/Browser forum.  

 

if you require more information, please feel free to contact me. 

 

cheers,

Troy Anderson

 

 

 

a completed and signed IPR Policy Agreement:
. attached
an indication of the Working Group(s) to which you are applying:
. Server Certificate WG, Code Signing Certificate WG, S/MIME Certificate WG
organization name:
. Common Crypto Authority (MN Statute 317A Domestic Non-Profit)
names and email addresses of employees who will participate on Forums:
. Troy Anderson, tran...@ccauth.org
an indication of which of such employees will be authorized to vote on Forum and working group ballots:
. requesting 'Interested Party' only, no ballot voting
emergency contact information
. Troy Anderson, tranders.ccauth.org, mobile 952-215-4775

 

 

Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)

unread,
Mar 8, 2024, 7:12:27 AMMar 8
to infrast...@cabforum.org
All,

According to the Bylaws, IPs are not allowed to attend Teleconferences or F2F Meetings without an invitation from the Chair. That means that access to the Webex information should only be given to IPs that have been invited to such meetings.


Thanks,
Dimitris.

PS: Inigo, I'm not sure if you noticed but you forwarded a message that was sent to a non-public mailing list (ques...@cabforum.org) to a public list with public access to its archive (infrast...@cabforum.org).
_______________________________________________
Infrastructure mailing list
Infrast...@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages