zircon-dev

Thanks for all the feedback here, folks. I've posted fxr/556408 to wrap up the discussion here

Yes, ZX_EXCEPTION_STATE_THREAD_EXIT is a better name, thanks for the suggestion! It turns out

Hi all, We've sent out a WIP RFC, https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/c/fuchsia/+/456870,

Hi Pedro, I'm not sure anyone has really investigated this properly. It seems to be a relatively

Usually programs just rely on the dynamic linker to do this, eg with `dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "

Hi all, I've sent out an RFC, proposing that we raise the minimum platform level for the x86-64

Ah, it seems like there is also a zircon_optimize argument you can use to just target the kernel

Hi Roland, I see, I wasn't aware that we don't actually need the -S, as the script would try

On 05/01/2021 19:48, Adam Barth wrote: > Hi Mickaël, > > Thanks for your email. Two process

Without restricting it, process creation becomes a capability all processes get automatically.

Fuchsia's code can be built by the Clang compiler using --target=*-fuchsia. On x86-64 (--target=

Oh yeah, I misread the original message, I don't think we're self-hosting at this point.

Yes, I'd recommend starting at https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/concepts/kernel for a conceptual

Awesome !!!! On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 5:03:19 PM UTC-5 Corey Tabaka wrote: Hi everyone,