component-framework-dev

Congratulations, RFC "Configuration Capabilities" (fxrev.dev/986276) has been accepted!

Congratulations, RFC "Component dictionaries" (fxrev.dev/910123) has been accepted! This

RFC "Component dictionaries" (fxrev.dev/910123) has entered into Last Call status. When an

Congratulations, RFC "Open package tracking" (fxrev.dev/839519) has been accepted! This RFC

RFC "Open package tracking" (fxrev.dev/839519) has entered into Last Call status. When an

RFC "Structured Configuration Bridge" (fxrev.dev/750302) has entered into Last Call status.

Congratulations, RFC "Structured Config Parent Overrides." (fxrev.dev/823149) has been

Congratulations, RFC "Structured Configuration Bridge" (fxrev.dev/750302) has been accepted

RFC "Structured Config Parent Overrides." (fxrev.dev/823149) has entered into Last Call

RFC "Structured Config Parent Overrides." (fxrev.dev/823149) is now in the "Iterate

RFC "Structured config directory overrides." (fxrev.dev/772502) is now in the "Iterate

Awesome, thanks! On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 7:22 AM Hunter Freyer <hjfr...@google.com> wrote: I

Apologies to come late to this, but are you looking for something like the "_TestBase"

Do we have a test for the PEER_CLOSED behavior? On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:02 AM 'Gary Bressler

The `LifecycleController` protocol is unnecessary here, add the following to the core realm: ``` {

Thanks for raising this, Yifei! I do love a good conversation about sample code. Hopefully the

Were there concrete use case(s) motivating the request for StopChild? If so, could you mention them

Thanks, Bruno and Peter! That works very nicely On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 5:15 PM Bruno Dal Bo <

Is manifest compilation the only case we have that uses this older wire format? If so, perhaps we

Thanks Derek and Justin for the additional information! It certainly helps get a bit more acquainted

Actions already have partial serialization, implemented in the actions themselves. For example, Start

Figured out the test. CL is ready for review. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:58 PM Adam Barth <abarth@

Yay, thank you! \o/ I'll start plumbing this through the driver framework late this week, or

Literally speak to the authors. See this thread: https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/g/tq-testing-

Actually, without binding to core, it seems system-update-committer gets started anyway. Turns out it

+James Tucker as well. tl'dr yes for ffx over serial from the host. And also very likely yes for

I think this is near to some other concepts, where we know that we have "known points" in

I'd use `fx args` to just add the var, instead of dealing with `fx set`, but effectively yes. On

Are there problems this feature could solve that package-relative components couldn't? If you

That's a question for the test architecture folks. The original problem that triggered this