Fwd: [PeerJ PrePrints] Your submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3469:0:0:CHECK:P)

[Tim Clark]

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

From: PeerJ <in...@peerj.com>

Subject: [PeerJ PrePrints] Your submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3469:0:0:CHECK:P)

Reply-To: PeerJ <in...@peerj.com>

To: Tim Clark <tim_...@harvard.edu>

Date: December 13, 2014 at 12:40:18 PM GMT

PeerJ

Thank you for submitting your manuscript, "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3469:0:0:CHECK:P) - it has now been received by PeerJ PrePrints. Next, it will be checked by PeerJ staff, who will notify you if any alterations are required to the manuscript or accompanying files. If the PrePrint successfully passes these checks, it will be made public. You will receive notification by email at each stage of this process; you can also check the status of your manuscript at any time. Regards, The PeerJ Team peerj.com

© 2014, PeerJ, Inc. PO Box 614 Corte Madera, CA 94976, USA

[Joan Starr]

Yay!

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to idmeta+un...@force11.org.

[Joe Hourcle]

In a couple of weeks will be the ESIP (Federation of Earth Science Information Partners) winter meeting.

I put in for a poster slot, but haven't figured out what to do.

I'm thinking that it might be a good chance to announce the pre-print, give a quick summary of the recommendations, and tell people to go to PeerJ to make comments.

Can anyone think of a good reason that I should *not* do this?

(I suspect that the AGU would have a cow if someone did anything like this, as they're really anal about 'pre-publication').

-Joe

[Tim Clark]

Sounds good to me...

Tim

[Joan Starr]

me too.

--Joan