query regarding open review for PeerJ article

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim Clark

unread,
Jan 20, 2015, 11:19:29 PM1/20/15
to <idmeta@force11.org>
I have been asked by the PeerJ editors whether we would like to participate in their Open Review initiative.  What this means is that we allow them to publish all the reviewer comments, back-and-forth, and intermediate versions of the article, alongside the final copy.  I am told about half their authors agree to this. 

Personally I am cool with that approach but would like to have a response from you all before I answer.  Probably it is fair to ask that all authors agree - if not we decline the invitation. 

Please respond asap.

Best

Tim


Melissa Haendel

unread,
Jan 20, 2015, 11:53:05 PM1/20/15
to Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
I'm fine w open. -Melissa 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to idmeta+un...@force11.org.

John Kratz

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 1:07:39 AM1/21/15
to Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
I’m very much in favor.

-John K.

Ruth Ellen Duerr

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 1:20:15 AM1/21/15
to John Kratz, Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
Fine by me - actually I was wondering why it wasn’t that way by default.

Ruth

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ruth Duerr
Data Stewardship and Informatics Lead
National Snow and Ice Data Center
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science
University of Colorado at Boulder
Boulder, CO 80309


Stefan Proell

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 3:00:49 AM1/21/15
to tim_...@harvard.edu, idm...@force11.org
open is good :-)

Regards

Stefan

Ivan Herman

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 3:04:28 AM1/21/15
to Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
Fine with me.

Ivan
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to idmeta+un...@force11.org.


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704




signature.asc

CODATA ED

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 4:58:40 AM1/21/15
to Ivan Herman, Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
I’m in favour of open peer review.

Best wishes,

Simon.
___________________________

CODATA: International Collaboration for Open Scientific Data, an information leaflet http://bit.ly/codata_info_14-09
___________________________
Dr Simon Hodson | Executive Director CODATA | http://www.codata.org

E-Mail: exe...@codata.org | Twitter: @simonhodson99 | Skype: simonhodson99
Blog: http://www.codata.org/blog
Diary: http://bit.ly/simonhodson99-calendar
Tel (Office): +33 1 45 25 04 96 | Tel (Cell): +33 6 86 30 42 59

CODATA (ICSU Committee on Data for Science and Technology), 5 rue Auguste Vacquerie, 75016 Paris, FRANCE

Haak, Laurel

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 6:28:45 AM1/21/15
to CODATA ED, Ivan Herman, Tim Clark, <idmeta@force11.org>
I am OK with open peer review.

-L


Joan Starr

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 8:14:40 AM1/21/15
to Tim Clark, idm...@force11.org

OK by me.
--Joan

Robert R Downs

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 8:25:20 AM1/21/15
to idm...@force11.org, Tim Clark
Fine with me, too.

Thanks,

Bob

Mercè Crosas

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 9:22:20 AM1/21/15
to Robert R Downs, idm...@force11.org, Tim Clark
With me too.

Merce


Mercè Crosas, Ph.D.
Director of Data Science, IQSS
Harvard University

Michel Dumontier

unread,
Jan 21, 2015, 12:41:19 PM1/21/15
to Mercè Crosas, Robert R Downs, idm...@force11.org, Tim Clark
yes, i agree with having an open review.

m.

Michel Dumontier
Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University
Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest Group
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages