Groups
Sign in
Groups
Z:ARCHIVE:WG:Identifier & Metadata team
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
Z:ARCHIVE:WG:Identifier & Metadata team
1–30 of 69
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Joan Starr
1/8/18
FW: Your PeerJ Article Stats
I'm hoping this mailing list is still live so that all of you can see our collective stats. This
unread,
FW: Your PeerJ Article Stats
I'm hoping this mailing list is still live so that all of you can see our collective stats. This
1/8/18
Joan Starr
,
Ruth Ellen Duerr
3
6/12/15
FW: A question has been asked on your PeerJ article
Thanks Ruth! From: Ruth Ellen Duerr [mailto:rdu...@Colorado.EDU] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:41 PM
unread,
FW: A question has been asked on your PeerJ article
Thanks Ruth! From: Ruth Ellen Duerr [mailto:rdu...@Colorado.EDU] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:41 PM
6/12/15
Joan Starr
, …
Ivan Herman
9
5/27/15
Our article is live!
Yay! :-) Ivan > On 27 May 2015, at 11:22 , Mercè Crosas <mcr...@iq.harvard.edu> wrote: >
unread,
Our article is live!
Yay! :-) Ivan > On 27 May 2015, at 11:22 , Mercè Crosas <mcr...@iq.harvard.edu> wrote: >
5/27/15
Tim Clark
, …
Amy L. Nurnberger
8
5/8/15
Fwd: Note from PeerJ regarding your Accepted Article: CS-2014:12:3509:2:0:ACCEPTED
Great news! Thank you to everyone for their work on this, especially Tim! Best, Amy
unread,
Fwd: Note from PeerJ regarding your Accepted Article: CS-2014:12:3509:2:0:ACCEPTED
Great news! Thank you to everyone for their work on this, especially Tim! Best, Amy
5/8/15
Tim Clark
,
Joan Starr
2
3/25/15
Fwd: Can we make very minor changes to the article before publication?
Yay! Thanks Tim, Joan From: Tim Clark [mailto:tim_...@harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015
unread,
Fwd: Can we make very minor changes to the article before publication?
Yay! Thanks Tim, Joan From: Tim Clark [mailto:tim_...@harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015
3/25/15
Tim Clark
,
Simone Sacchi
2
3/24/15
suggested changes to article & expected publication date
Thank you for sharing Tim. Best, Simone ––––––––––––– Simone Sacchi Research and Scholarship
unread,
suggested changes to article & expected publication date
Thank you for sharing Tim. Best, Simone ––––––––––––– Simone Sacchi Research and Scholarship
3/24/15
Tim Clark
, …
Mercè Crosas
30
3/14/15
Fwd: Decision on your PeerJ submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3509:2:0:REVIEW)
Even though I like the new title, with "machine actionable", after thinking more about it,
unread,
Fwd: Decision on your PeerJ submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3509:2:0:REVIEW)
Even though I like the new title, with "machine actionable", after thinking more about it,
3/14/15
Tim Clark
, …
Ivan Herman
4
2/4/15
last call before resubmission - all requested changes so far are included
Thanks Tim. Let us consider it done:-) Ivan > On 03 Feb 2015, at 20:49 , Tim Clark <tim_clark@
unread,
last call before resubmission - all requested changes so far are included
Thanks Tim. Let us consider it done:-) Ivan > On 03 Feb 2015, at 20:49 , Tim Clark <tim_clark@
2/4/15
Tim Clark
, …
Joan Starr
9
2/3/15
Accessibility article last resubmission
Thanks! From: Tim Clark [mailto:tim_...@harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:47 AM To:
unread,
Accessibility article last resubmission
Thanks! From: Tim Clark [mailto:tim_...@harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:47 AM To:
2/3/15
Tim Clark
2/3/15
PeerJ Computer Science
Check out the Advisory Board. Also, if you register interest you can get free $99 publishing credits.
unread,
PeerJ Computer Science
Check out the Advisory Board. Also, if you register interest you can get free $99 publishing credits.
2/3/15
Joe Hourcle
2/1/15
John Kunze's comments on the paper
I don't know how familiar people are with reading unified diffs, but here are the edits that I
unread,
John Kunze's comments on the paper
I don't know how familiar people are with reading unified diffs, but here are the edits that I
2/1/15
Tim Clark
, …
Joe Hourcle
3
2/1/15
Fwd: Decision on your PeerJ submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3509:1:1:REVIEW)
On Feb 1, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Tim Clark wrote: > The PeerJ decision on our article is “accept with
unread,
Fwd: Decision on your PeerJ submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3509:1:1:REVIEW)
On Feb 1, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Tim Clark wrote: > The PeerJ decision on our article is “accept with
2/1/15
Tim Clark
1/21/15
open peer review final call
Most of you have given assent to open peer review and nobody has objected. So rather than chase
unread,
open peer review final call
Most of you have given assent to open peer review and nobody has objected. So rather than chase
1/21/15
Tim Clark
, …
Michel Dumontier
12
1/21/15
query regarding open review for PeerJ article
yes, i agree with having an open review. m. Michel Dumontier Associate Professor of Medicine (
unread,
query regarding open review for PeerJ article
yes, i agree with having an open review. m. Michel Dumontier Associate Professor of Medicine (
1/21/15
Tim Clark
1/10/15
preprint (v3): Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications
The new version of our article, "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in
unread,
preprint (v3): Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications
The new version of our article, "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in
1/10/15
Tim Clark
, …
Joe Hourcle
14
1/9/15
last call for revision - IDMETA PeerJ article resubmission
On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Arthur Smith wrote: > One other thought, on point 1 of my earlier
unread,
last call for revision - IDMETA PeerJ article resubmission
On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Arthur Smith wrote: > One other thought, on point 1 of my earlier
1/9/15
Tim Clark
, …
Joan Starr
8
1/8/15
best practices for dataset description
OK sure. --Joan On Jan 8, 2015 6:00 PM, "Tim Clark" <tim_...@harvard.edu> wrote: Or
unread,
best practices for dataset description
OK sure. --Joan On Jan 8, 2015 6:00 PM, "Tim Clark" <tim_...@harvard.edu> wrote: Or
1/8/15
Joe Hourcle
, …
Melissa Haendel
9
1/8/15
possible addition : mention XSLT
Its not a big deal, just feels like if we are going to talk about it we'd want to do it justice.
unread,
possible addition : mention XSLT
Its not a big deal, just feels like if we are going to talk about it we'd want to do it justice.
1/8/15
Joe Hourcle
1/7/15
finished my updates to the article.
I added a paragraph at the end of the 'Why cite data?' section, talking about attribution
unread,
finished my updates to the article.
I added a paragraph at the end of the 'Why cite data?' section, talking about attribution
1/7/15
Joe Hourcle
1/7/15
behind on writing my portion
Too many late nights / early mornings due to the paper + ESIP poster caught up with me, and I crashed
unread,
behind on writing my portion
Too many late nights / early mornings due to the paper + ESIP poster caught up with me, and I crashed
1/7/15
Joe Hourcle
1/6/15
Fwd: PeerJ paper comments (from Ruth)
I didn't realize that Ruth had sent these to me, not because she was keeping it quiet, but
unread,
Fwd: PeerJ paper comments (from Ruth)
I didn't realize that Ruth had sent these to me, not because she was keeping it quiet, but
1/6/15
Joe Hourcle
1/6/15
'vagueness' of the paper's title
I don't know if this came through during the telecon, but as you send to send them by today.
unread,
'vagueness' of the paper's title
I don't know if this came through during the telecon, but as you send to send them by today.
1/6/15
Joe Hourcle
,
Joan Starr
2
1/6/15
call in info?
US: +1 800-501-8979 Intl: +1 30 32 489 662 Code: 7688522 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Hourcle
unread,
call in info?
US: +1 800-501-8979 Intl: +1 30 32 489 662 Code: 7688522 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Hourcle
1/6/15
Joe Hourcle
1/6/15
some thoughts on the additions to the paper
I'm hoping to find a quiet place that I can call in from .... but in talking to Ruth this morning
unread,
some thoughts on the additions to the paper
I'm hoping to find a quiet place that I can call in from .... but in talking to Ruth this morning
1/6/15
Joe Hourcle
2
1/6/15
an update on the "Data access methods" section re-write.
On Jan 6, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Joe Hourcle wrote: > > I've started the re-write, but realized
unread,
an update on the "Data access methods" section re-write.
On Jan 6, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Joe Hourcle wrote: > > I've started the re-write, but realized
1/6/15
Tim Clark
, …
Melissa Haendel
36
1/5/15
Decision on PeerJ submission, with new Revised version for your review
Hi all, here are some edits from me. I didn't quite make it to the end, ran out of time today.
unread,
Decision on PeerJ submission, with new Revised version for your review
Hi all, here are some edits from me. I didn't quite make it to the end, ran out of time today.
1/5/15
Joe Hourcle
1/4/15
@#!# spam filters
It seems that I e-mailed Joan & Tim yesterday evening about stuff in the submitted paper, not
unread,
@#!# spam filters
It seems that I e-mailed Joan & Tim yesterday evening about stuff in the submitted paper, not
1/4/15
Tim Clark
, …
Joan Starr
5
12/22/14
Fwd: [PeerJ PrePrints] Your submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3469:0:0:CHECK:P)
me too. --Joan On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Tim Clark <tim_...@harvard.edu> wrote: Sounds
unread,
Fwd: [PeerJ PrePrints] Your submission: "Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications" (#2014:12:3469:0:0:CHECK:P)
me too. --Joan On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Tim Clark <tim_...@harvard.edu> wrote: Sounds
12/22/14
Tim Clark
12/14/14
PS PeerJ submission system comments
PS I found the PeerJ submission system to be far superior in clarity and straightforwardness to any
unread,
PS PeerJ submission system comments
PS I found the PeerJ submission system to be far superior in clarity and straightforwardness to any
12/14/14
Tim Clark
12/14/14
manuscript submitted for peer review
with a few minor tweaks, see version 2 in the preprint server. Tim
unread,
manuscript submitted for peer review
with a few minor tweaks, see version 2 in the preprint server. Tim
12/14/14