Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Proposed Channel Naming Convention addition

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim Ahern

unread,
Oct 30, 2007, 11:55:50 PM10/30/07
to fdsn-w...@fdsn.org
Dear WG II

I was contacted by a data supplier in Alaska that monitors lightening
strikes by measuring changes in electrical potential in the air as
measured
by an antenna. He would like to name it EQO

The E is standard
the Q is for Electrical Potential

They would like to add a code of O for omnidirectional for the
orientation as this sensor has no preferred direction.

Do I have your approval to add the O designation after the Q
Electrical Potential Instrumentation? I think this has no adverse
effects. I will wait to hear back from Bernard before making the change.

Cheers
Tim


Program Manager, IRIS Data Management System
IRIS DMC
1408 NE 45th Street #201
Seattle, WA 98105

(206)547-0393 x118
(206) 547-1093 FAX


Jim Lyons

unread,
Oct 31, 2007, 6:13:12 PM10/31/07
to fdsn-w...@fdsn.org
Hi Tim,

Fine by me.

Cheers,
Jim
_________________________________________________
Jim Lyons
+1 613 995 5526 facsimile / télécopieur +1 613 992 8836
jly...@NRCan.gc.ca

Earthquakes Canada Séismes Canada
Canadian Hazard Information Service /
Service canadien d'information sur les risques
7 Observatory Crescent 7 Place de l'Observatoire
Ottawa ON Canada K1A 0Y3

Natural Resources Canada Ressources naturelles Canada
Government of Canada Gouvernement du Canada
--------'\/\/`V^V^v\/\/\/\/\/\/`Vv^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v--v^-------


________________________________

Tim Ahern

unread,
Nov 1, 2007, 6:47:30 PM11/1/07
to fdsn-w...@fdsn.org
I would vote in favor of this small change. Jim Lyons responded in
favor yesterday as well.

Tim

Program Manager, IRIS Data Management System
IRIS DMC
1408 NE 45th Street #201
Seattle, WA 98105


On Nov 1, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Dost, Bernard ((KNMI)) wrote:

> Dear Tim and other members of the WG2
>
> I do not see any problem. In order to allow everyone to react, I
> propose to have a two week period to collect reactions.
> Any objections?
>
> Cheers
> Bernard

Dost, Bernard (KNMI)

unread,
Nov 2, 2007, 2:16:41 AM11/2/07
to fdsn-w...@fdsn.org
Dear Tim and other members of the WG2

I do not see any problem. In order to allow everyone to react, I propose
to have a two week period to collect reactions.

Any objections?

Cheers

Bernard

________________________________

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages