The FDSN Working Group I on Station Siting and Instrumentation will be held on Friday, July 12, 2019 in Room 513D of the Montreal Convention Center from 12:00 to 13:30.
The draft agenda for the WG I meeting is listed below:
12:00 Review and Approval of the 2017 Minutes from Kobe
Please see http://www.fdsn.org/media/wg/I/2017/FDSNWG1.ppt
12:05 Review of the Definition of the FDSN Backbone Stations
Please see http://www.fdsn.org/media/wg/I/2009/2009_FDSN_WG1_minutes.pdf
and http://www.fdsn.org/media/wg/I/2017/FDSNWG1.ppt for details.
A tentative statement is proposed below, which will be discussed during the meeting:
"A subset of 250 (need more?) stations chosen on the basis of hardware standards (VBB or BB and VLP, 3-component, dynamic range greater than 100db), noise characteristics, geographical location, and status (installed or installation imminent)."
The current _FDSN backbone stations can be found at
http://www.iris.edu/mda/_FDSN or http://www.iris.edu/gmap/_FDSN
(Note that 38 stations there are not available Right Now.)
12:35 Replacement of the FDSN station inventory which was maintained in an excel file.
12:50 A quick report of the performance of the FDSN backbone stations
(Do we need to increase the number of FDSN backbone stations? If yes, how many?)
13:20 Other business
13:30 Adjourn
If there are any items you think we should discuss in the meeting as well, please just let me know that.
See you soon,
Wen-Tzong
-------------------------------
Wen-Tzong Liang
Chair of FDSN WG1
Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
http://bats.earth.sinica.edu.tw
http://tec.earth.sinica.edu.tw
As shown in the attached image files, BFO's noise level (mode value in blue color) is pretty low compared to the rest of 139 FDSN stations (gray lines). Personally I love the performance of BFO station.
_06.jpg: June of 2018
_12.jpg: December of 2018
We can figure out criteria for selecting potential new FDSN stations during the WG-1 meeting. Are you coming for the IUGG meeting this year?
Wen-Tzong
-----Original message-----
From:Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig <wid...@gis.uni-stuttgart.de>
To:Wen-Tzong Liang <w...@earth.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc:Pete Davis <Pda...@ucsd.edu>,Thomas Forbriger <Thomas.F...@kit.edu>,Kutterer,Hansjörg (GIK) <Hansjoerg...@kit.edu>
Date:Wed, 26 Jun 2019 23:30:17
Subject:Re: [fdsn-wg1-stations] [fdsn-wg1-stations] FDSN Working Group I draft agenda
Dear Wen-Tzong,
I would like to propose to include BFO, an affiliated IRIS/IDA station,
in the group of FDSN backbone stations.
As argument for including BFO in this group of stations I would put
forward the very low noise level in
the frequency band of the Earth's free oscillations.
See for example the ranking of BFO in the near real-time noise plots of
Goran Ekstrom (Lamont)
https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~ekstrom/Research/Noise/RADB_hourly_rms.html
Discoveries made based on BFO data include:
Horizontal Hum (Kurrle & Widmer-Schnidrig, GRL, 2008)
Observation of Coriolis coupled modes below 1mHz (Zuern et
al., GJI, 2000)
On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz
using local
barometric pressure (Zuern & Widmer, GRL, 1995)
This last paper was at the start of installing
barometers at GSN stations.
I cc this mail to Pete Davis (IRIS/IDA) as he knows BFO very well too.
Sincerely,
Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig, BFO
Am 25.06.19 um 19:39 schrieb Wen-Tzong Liang:
> ----------------------
> FDSN Working Group I
> Topic home: http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/topic/fdsn-wg1-stations/ | Unsubscribe: fdsn-wg1-stati...@lists.fdsn.org
>
> Sent from the FDSN Message Center (http://www.fdsn.org/message-center/)
> Update subscription preferences at http://www.fdsn.org/account/profile/
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig
Black Forest Observatory (BFO)
Heubach 206
D-77709 Wolfach, Germany
e-mail: wid...@gis.uni-stuttgart.de
phone: +49 7836 2151
fax: +49 7836 955240
48d 19' 48.24" North 8d 19' 23.13" East
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Thanks for the plot. I am impressed with the superb low noise level of BFO.
Best regards,
Wen-Tzong
-----Original message-----
From:Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig <wid...@gis.uni-stuttgart.de>
To:wtl <w...@earth.sinica.edu.tw>,FDSN Working Group I <fdsn-wg1...@lists.fdsn.org>
Cc:Pete Davis <Pda...@ucsd.edu>,Thomas Forbriger <Thomas.F...@kit.edu>,Kutterer,Hansjörg (GIK) <Hansjoerg...@kit.edu>
Date:Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:37:55
Subject:Re: [fdsn-wg1-stations] FDSN Working Group I draft agenda
Dear Wen-Tzong,
the quality of BFO shows best in the band 200 - 3000 seconds.
This is the band of the Earth's free oscillations and it is outside the
frequency band covered by your plots.
The contribution of BFO STS-1 data to the GSN low-noise model of Berger
et al. (2004) is illustrated in the attached plot.
The plot shows that there are several bands where the STS-1 seismometer
at BFO - both vertical and horizontal - helps to define the vertical and
horizontal GSN low-noise model.
Unfortunately I cannot come to IUGG but I imagine that there are plenty
of people in WG1 that know BFO.
kind regards,
Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig
Am 02.07.19 um 11:11 schrieb wtl: