Prioritizing screens for VPAT review

[Stephanie Leary]

We had a brief discussion in today's meeting about which screens we might want the Board to prioritize for future VPAT reviews. The OPAC was just done in January (and the results are so encouraging!), but the new self checkout screen hasn't been done yet. Terran is working on a KPAC update, and we should probably have that reviewed when it's finished.

On the staff side, priorities are somewhat less clear. Obviously, the Circulation screens get the most use, but as they are still in AngularJS, we don't necessarily want to devote resources to them at the moment.

My feeling is that the login and workstation registration process alone is enough for one small chunk of work, especially if we include MFA and/or the in-progress SSO work.

Any automatically generated basic administration page and config update workflow will include grid, the fieldmapper editor, and most of our core form UI components like combobox, org select, and tree.

Catalog search, search results, and search preferences are probably the most used interfaces besides Circulation.

Any other considerations for the list so far?

I've added a section to our VPAT wiki page:

https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=accessibility:vpat#staff_client_testing_queue

Please feel free to add to it as this discussion progresses.

Stephanie Leary
Front End Developer
Equinox Open Library Initiative
stephan...@equinoxOLI.org
https://www.equinoxOLI.org
phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)